Hi,
I’d like to confirm something regarding the hosting of the apple-app-site-association (AASA) file.
We have a server that publicly hosts the AASA file and is accessible globally. However, this server sits behind an additional security layer (a security server/reverse proxy).
My question is:
Will this security layer affect Apple’s ability to access and validate the AASA file for Universal Links or App Clips?
Are there specific requirements (e.g. headers, redirects, TLS versions, etc.) that we need to ensure the security server does not block or modify?
Any guidance or best practices would be appreciated.
Prioritize user privacy and data security in your app. Discuss best practices for data handling, user consent, and security measures to protect user information.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
We are experiencing a significant issue with macOS security alerts that began on July 9th, at approximately 4:40 AM UTC. This alert is incorrectly identifying output files from our snippet tests as malware, causing these files to be blocked and moved to the Trash. This is completely disrupting our automated testing workflows.
Issue Description:
Alert: We are seeing the "Malware Blocked and Moved to Trash" popup window.
Affected Files: The security alert triggers when attempting to execute .par files generated as outputs from our snippet tests. These .par files are unique to each individual test run; they are not a single, static tool.
System-Wide Impact: This issue is impacting multiple macOS hosts across our testing infrastructure.
Timeline: The issue began abruptly on July 9th, at approximately 4:40 AM UTC. Before that time, our tests were functioning correctly.
macOS Versions: The problem is occurring on hosts running both macOS 14.x and 15.x.
Experimental Host: Even after upgrading an experimental host to macOS 15.6 beta 2, the issue persisted.
Local execution: The issue can be reproduced locally.
Observations:
The security system is consistently flagging these snippet test output files as malware.
Since each test generates a new .par file, and this issue is impacting all generated files, the root cause doesn't appear to be specific to the code within the .par files themselves.
This issue is impacting all the snippet tests, making us believe that the root cause is not related to our code.
The sudden and widespread nature of the issue strongly suggests a change in a security database or rule, rather than a change in our testing code.
Questions:
Could a recent update to the XProtect database be the cause of this false positive?
Are there any known issues or recent changes in macOS security mechanisms that could cause this kind of widespread and sudden impact?
What is the recommended way to diagnose and resolve this kind of false positive?
We appreciate any guidance or assistance you can provide. Thank you.
I have Authorisation Plugin which talks using XPC to my Launch Daemon to perform privileged actions.
I want to protect my XPC service narrowing it to be called from known trusted clients.
Now since I want authorisation plugin code which is from apple to call my service, I cannot use my own team id or app group here.
I am currently banking on following properties of client connection.
Apple Team ID : EQHXZ8M8AV
Bundle ID starting with com.apple.
Client signature verified By Apple.
This is what I have come up with.
func isClientTrusted(connection: NSXPCConnection) -> Bool {
let clientPID = connection.processIdentifier
logInfo("🔍 Checking XPC Client - PID: \(clientPID)")
var secCode: SecCode?
var secStaticCode: SecStaticCode?
let attributes = [kSecGuestAttributePid: clientPID] as NSDictionary
let status = SecCodeCopyGuestWithAttributes(nil, attributes, [], &secCode)
guard status == errSecSuccess, let code = secCode else {
logInfo("Failed to get SecCode for PID \(clientPID)")
return false
}
let staticStatus = SecCodeCopyStaticCode(code, [], &secStaticCode)
guard staticStatus == errSecSuccess, let staticCode = secStaticCode else {
logInfo("Failed to get SecStaticCode")
return false
}
var signingInfo: CFDictionary?
let signingStatus = SecCodeCopySigningInformation(staticCode, SecCSFlags(rawValue: kSecCSSigningInformation), &signingInfo)
guard signingStatus == errSecSuccess, let info = signingInfo as? [String: Any] else {
logInfo("Failed to retrieve signing info")
return false
}
// Extract and Verify Team ID
if let teamID = info["teamid"] as? String {
logInfo("XPC Client Team ID: \(teamID)")
if teamID != "EQHXZ8M8AV" { // Apple's official Team ID
logInfo("Client is NOT signed by Apple")
return false
}
} else {
logInfo("Failed to retrieve Team ID")
return false
}
// Verify Bundle ID Starts with "com.apple."
if let bundleID = info["identifier"] as? String {
logInfo("XPC Client Bundle ID: \(bundleID)")
if !bundleID.hasPrefix("com.apple.") {
logInfo("Client is NOT an Apple system process")
return false
}
} else {
logInfo("Failed to retrieve Bundle Identifier")
return false
}
// Verify Apple Code Signature Trust
var trustRequirement: SecRequirement?
let trustStatus = SecRequirementCreateWithString("anchor apple" as CFString, [], &trustRequirement)
guard trustStatus == errSecSuccess, let trust = trustRequirement else {
logInfo("Failed to create trust requirement")
return false
}
let verifyStatus = SecStaticCodeCheckValidity(staticCode, [], trust)
if verifyStatus != errSecSuccess {
logInfo("Client's signature is NOT trusted by Apple")
return false
}
logInfo("Client is fully verified as Apple-trusted")
return true
}
Q: Just wanted community feedback, is this correct approach?
I have a custom NSWindow that I want to exclude from screen capture by setting its sharing state to kCGWindowSharingStateSharingNone. The goal is to prevent this window from appearing in the content captured by ScreenCaptureKit.
[window setSharingType:NSWindowSharingType::NSWindowSharingNone];
However, on macOS 15.4+ (Sequoia), the window is still captured by ScreenCaptureKit and appears in the shared content.
Does anyone know if kCGWindowSharingStateSharingNone is still effective with ScreenCaptureKit on macOS 15.4 and later?
Hello,
We are working on integrating app integrity verification into our service application, following Apple's App Attest and DeviceCheck guide.
Our server issues a challenge to the client, which then sends the challenge, attestation, and keyId in CBOR format to Apple's App Attest server for verification. However, we are unable to reach both https://attest.apple.com and https://attest.development.apple.com due to network issues.
These attempts have been made from both our internal corporate network and mobile hotspot environments. Despite adjusting DNS settings and other configurations, the issue persists.
Are there alternative methods or solutions to address this problem? Any recommended network configurations or guidelines to successfully connect to Apple's App Attest servers would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
I have a small command-line app I've been using for years to process files. I have it run by an Automator script, so that I can drop files onto it. It stopped working this morning.
At first, I could still run the app from the command line, without Automator. But then after I recompiled the app, now I cannot even do that. When I run it, it's saying 'zsh: killed' followed by my app's path. What is that?
The app does run if I run it from Xcode.
How do I fix this?
Topic:
Privacy & Security
SubTopic:
General
I want iOS device identifier for a framework that is used in multiple vendor's apps.
I'm developing a framework to control a peripheral. The framework has to send unique information to register the device with the peripheral.
My naive idea was to use IdentifierForVendor. But this API provides the device identifier for the same vendor's apps, not the framework. (The framework will be used by multiple vendors.)
Is there a usable device identifier for the framework, regardless of app vendor?
Please tell me any solution.
Dear Apple Developer Technical Support,
We are currently following the official Apple documentation “TN3159: Migrating Sign in with Apple users for an app transfer” to carry out a Sign in with Apple user migration after successfully transferring several apps to a new developer account.
Here is a summary of our situation:
Under the original Apple developer account, we had five apps using Sign in with Apple, grouped under a shared primary app using App Grouping.
Recently, we transferred three of these apps to our new Apple developer account via App Store Connect.
After the transfer, these three apps are no longer associated with the original primary App ID. We reconfigured individual Services IDs for each app in the new account and enabled Sign in with Apple for each.
More than 24 hours have passed since the app transfer was completed.
Now we are attempting to follow the migration process to restore user access via the user.migration flow. Specifically, we are using the following script to request an Apple access token:
url = "https://appleid.apple.com/auth/token"
headers = {"Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"}
data = {
"grant_type": "client_credentials",
"scope": "user.migration",
"client_id": "com.game.friends.ios.toptop.sea", # New Services ID in the new account
"client_secret": "<JWT signed with new p8 key>"
}
response = requests.post(url, headers=headers, data=data)
However, the API response consistently returns:
{
"error": "invalid_client"
}
We have verified that the following configurations are correct:
The client_secret is generated using the p8 key from the new account, signed with ES256 and correct key_id, team_id, and client_id.
The client_id corresponds to the Services ID created in the new account and properly associated with the migrated app.
The scope is set to user.migration.
The JWT payload contains correct iss, sub, and aud values as per Apple documentation.
The app has been fully transferred and reconfigured more than 24 hours ago.
Problem Summary & Request for Support:
According to Apple’s official documentation:
“After an app is transferred, Apple updates the Sign in with Apple configuration in the background. This can take up to 24 hours. During this time, attempts to authenticate users or validate tokens may fail.”
However, we are still consistently receiving invalid_client errors after the 24-hour waiting period. We suspect one of the following issues:
The transferred apps may still be partially associated with the original App Grouping or primary App ID.
Some Sign in with Apple configuration in Apple’s backend may not have been fully updated after the transfer.
Or the Services ID is not yet fully operational for the transferred apps in the new account.
We kindly request your assistance to:
Verify whether the transferred apps have been completely detached from the original App Grouping and primary App ID.
Confirm whether the new Services IDs under the new account are fully functional and eligible for Sign in with Apple with user.migration scope.
Help identify any remaining configuration or migration issues that may cause the invalid_client error.
If necessary, assist in manually ungrouping or clearing any residual App Grouping relationships affecting the new environment.
We have also generated and retained the original transfer_sub identifiers and are fully prepared to complete the sub mapping once the user.migration flow becomes functional.
Thank you very much for your time and support!
Topic:
Privacy & Security
SubTopic:
Sign in with Apple
Tags:
Sign in with Apple REST API
Sign in with Apple
I am developing a sample authorization plugin to sync the user’s local password to the network password. During the process, I prompt the user to enter both their old and new passwords in custom plugin. After the user enters the information, I use the following code to sync the passwords:
try record.changePassword(oldPssword, toPassword: newPassword)
However, I have noticed that this is clearing all saved keychain information, such as web passwords and certificates. Is it expected behavior for record.changePassword to clear previously stored keychain data?
If so, how can I overcome this issue and ensure the keychain information is preserved while syncing the password?
Thank you for your help!
I had the following code in a program that I used to encrypt some important files. I haven't run it in a few years. It used to work, and now it seems the password is mysteriously gone from my Keychain! The return value is now errSecItemNotFound.
I'm upset with myself for not backing up the key/password somewhere else. Is there anywhere this could be hiding? Did Apple move it somewhere? I know they created this "Passwords" app in recent years, but I don't see anything in there with the "account" string I used. I run the app from Xcode, so maybe it is in the "container" data somewhere? I do see keychain files under ~/Library.
Maybe there is a way to look through old Time Machine backups. Ug. So stressful.
Just looking for pointers on where the data might be, and why it might have disappeared. Unfortunately it was not a "guessable" password, it was a generated 256 bit key, base64 encoded. Perhaps I could crack that with brute force if I'm determined enough...
public static func queryGenericPasswordAsString(account: String) throws -> String {
let query: [String: Any] = [kSecClass as String: kSecClassGenericPassword,
kSecMatchLimit as String: kSecMatchLimitOne,
kSecAttrAccount as String: account,
kSecReturnAttributes as String: true,
kSecReturnData as String: true]
var item: CFTypeRef?
let status = SecItemCopyMatching(query as CFDictionary, &item)
guard status != errSecItemNotFound else { throw KeychainError.noPassword }
...
}
Topic:
Privacy & Security
SubTopic:
General
Hi,
I am using CryptoKit in my app. I am getting an error sometimes with some users. I log the description to Firebase but I am not sure what is it exactly about.
CryptoKit.CryptoKitError error 2
CryptoKit.CryptoKitError error 3
I receive both of these errors. I also save debug prints to a log file and let users share them with me. Logs are line-by-line encrypted but after getting these errors in the app also decryption of log files doesn't work and it throws these errors too.
I couldn't reproduce the same error by myself, and I can't reach the user's logs so I am a little blind about what triggers this.
It would be helpful to understand what these errors mean.
Thanks
Hi! I'm trying to add Sign in with Apple to my macOS app. I enabled this capability from the developer portal and created the corresponding certificate & provisioning profile (both of type Developer ID Application.) However, Xcode keeps prompting me that the profile doesn't support Sign in with Apple.
If I enable Automatically manage signing from Xcode, I can build and run the app but not distribute. If I turn it off and use the profile I got, it just keeps showing the errors below and doesn't even let me build.
Topic:
Privacy & Security
SubTopic:
Sign in with Apple
Tags:
Provisioning Profiles
Sign in with Apple
Signing Certificates
Before device Reboot:
Here no issue from keychain.
2025-06-17 11:18:17.956334 +0530 WAVE PTX [DB_ENCRYPTION] Key successfully retrieved from the Keychain default
When device is in reboot and locked (Keychain access is set to FirstUnlock)
App got woken up in background
SEEMS(NOT SURE) DEVICE STILL IN LOCKED STARE IF YES THEN WHICH IS EXPECTED
2025-06-17 12:12:30.036184 +0530 WAVE PTX <ALA_ERROR>: [OS-CCF] [DB_ENCRYPTION] Error while retriving Private key -25308 default
2025-06-17 12:15:28.914700 +0530 WAVE PTX <ALA_ERROR> [DB_ENCRYPTION] Error retrieving key from the Keychain: -25300 default
——————————————————
And as per logs, here user has launch the application post unlock and application never got the keychain access here also.
HERE STILL HAS ISSUE WITH KEYCHAIN ACCESS.
2025-06-17 12:52:55.640976 +0530 WAVE PTX DEBUG : willFinishLaunchingWithOptions default
2025-06-17 12:52:55.651371 +0530 WAVE PTX <ALA_ERROR> [DB_ENCRYPTION] Error retrieving key from the Keychain: -25300 default
Hi,
I develop a Mac application, initially on Catalina/Xcode12, but I recently upgrade to Monterey/Xcode13. I'm about to publish a new version: on Monterey all works as expected, but when I try the app on Sequoia, as a last step before uploading to the App Store, I encountered some weird security issues:
The main symptom is that it's no longer possible to save any file from the app using the Save panel, although the User Select File entitlement is set to Read/Write.
I've tried reinstalling different versions of the app, including the most recent downloaded from TestFlight. But, whatever the version, any try to save using the panel (e.g. on the desktop) results in a warning telling that I don't have authorization to record the file to that folder.
Moreover, when I type spctl -a -t exec -v /Applications/***.app in the terminal, it returns rejected, even when the application has been installed by TestFlight.
An EtreCheck report tells that my app is not signed, while codesign -dv /Applications/***.app returns a valid signature. I'm lost...
It suspect a Gate Keeper problem, but I cannot found any info on the web about how this system could be reset. I tried sudo spctl --reset-default, but it returns This operation is no longer supported...
I wonder if these symptoms depend on how the app is archived and could be propagated to my final users, or just related to a corrupted install of Sequoia on my local machine. My feeling is that a signature problem should have been detected by the archive validation, but how could we be sure?
Any idea would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
I am developing an Authorisation Plugin which talks to Launch daemons over XPC.
Above is working neat, now I have to decide on how to get it installed on a machine.
Installation requires.
Plugin Installation
Launch Daemon Installation
Both require
Moving binary and text (.plist) file into privileged system managed directory.
Firing install/load commands as root (sudo).
I have referred this post BSD Privilege Escalation on macOS, but I am still not clear how to approach this.
Q: My requirement is:
I can use .pkg builder and install via script, however I have some initialisation task that needs to be performed. User will enter some details talk to a remote server and get some keys, all goes well restarts the system and my authorisation plugin will welcome him and get him started.
If I cannot perform initialisation I will have to do it post restart on login screen which I want to avoid if possible.
I tried unconventional way of using AppleScript from a SwiftUI application to run privileged commands, I am fine if it prompts for admin credentials, but it did not work.
I don't want that I do something and when approving it from Apple it gets rejected.
Basically, how can I provide some GUI to do initialisation during installation or may be an app which helps in this.
Q: Please also guide if I am doing elevated actions, how will it affect app distribution mechanism. In Read Me for EvenBetterAuthorizationSample I read it does.
Thanks.
First, I do not publish my application to the AppStore, but I need to customize a sandbox environment. It seems that sandbox-exec cannot configure entitlements, so I have used some other APIs, such as sandbox_compile_entitlements and sandbox_apply_container. When encountering the entitlement "com.apple.security.files.user-selected.read-only", I am unsure how to correctly write sandbox profile to implement this. Can anyone help me?
Hi team, is there a native way to detect if a change has been made to biometrics using FaceID or TouchID? Thanks in advance.
I'm working on a Password Manager app that integrates with the AutoFill Credential Provider to provide stored passwords and OTPs to the user within Safari and other apps.
Password AutoFill works perfectly.
I'm unable to get iOS to register that the app supports OTPs though.
I've followed the Apple documentation here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/authenticationservices/providing-one-time-passcodes-to-autofill and added "ProvidesOneTimeCodes" to the AutoFill extension's Info.plist, but iOS just doesn't seem to notice the OTP support.
<key>ASCredentialProviderExtensionCapabilities</key>
<dict>
<key>ProvidesOneTimeCodes</key>
<true/>
<key>ProvidesPasswords</key>
<true/>
</dict>
Any help would be greatly appreicated!
Topic:
Privacy & Security
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
Extensions
Entitlements
Autofill
Authentication Services
Hi,
when creating a CryptoTokenKit extension according to https://developer.apple.com/documentation/cryptotokenkit/authenticating-users-with-a-cryptographic-token, it is neccessary to register it under the securityagent in order to make the CTK usable before login. i.e. we want to run
sudo -u _securityagent /Applications/HostApp.app/Contents/MacOS/HostApp
However, even with the empty application the command fails with
illegal hardware instruction sudo -u _securityagent /Applications/HostApp.app/Contents/MacOS/HostApp
I see that it always crashes when the HostApp is sandboxed, but it does not work even without sandboxing (i am sharing the error report message below).
i actually noticed that when the HostApp is sandboxed and I run the above command, the extension starts to be usable even before login, even though i see the HostApp crash. The same does not happen without the sandbox
So I am curious how to in fact properly register the CTK extension under security agent? Also am not sure how to unregister it from the _securityagent
thank you for your help
Version: 1.0 (1)
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: Exited process [9395]
Responsible: Terminal [399]
User ID: 92
Date/Time: 2025-03-21 18:54:03.0684 +0100
OS Version: macOS 15.3.2 (24D81)
Report Version: 12
Bridge OS Version: 9.3 (22P3060)
Anonymous UUID: 41F9918C-5BCA-01C7-59C2-3E8CFC3F8653
Sleep/Wake UUID: 8AB66C75-3C32-41D4-9BD4-887B0FB468FE
Time Awake Since Boot: 4300 seconds
Time Since Wake: 1369 seconds
System Integrity Protection: enabled
Crashed Thread: 0 Dispatch queue: WMClientWindowManager
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION (SIGILL)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000001, 0x0000000000000000
Termination Reason: Namespace SIGNAL, Code 4 Illegal instruction: 4
Terminating Process: exc handler [9396]
Application Specific Signatures:
API Misuse
Thread 0 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: WMClientWindowManager
0 libxpc.dylib 0x7ff80667b2bd _xpc_api_misuse + 113
1 libxpc.dylib 0x7ff80665f0e4 xpc_connection_set_target_uid + 187
2 WindowManagement 0x7ffd0b946693 -[WMClientWindowManager _createXPCConnection] + 1011
3 WindowManagement 0x7ffd0b947361 -[WMClientWindowManager _xpcConnection] + 65
4 WindowManagement 0x7ffd0b9447c9 __31-[WMClientWindowManager stages]_block_invoke + 41
5 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff8067af7e2 _dispatch_client_callout + 8
6 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff8067bca2c _dispatch_lane_barrier_sync_invoke_and_complete + 60
7 WindowManagement 0x7ffd0b9446fc -[WMClientWindowManager stages] + 268
8 AppKit 0x7ff80b1fd0b7 __54-[NSWMWindowCoordinator initializeStageFramesIfNeeded]_block_invoke + 30
9 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff8067af7e2 _dispatch_client_callout + 8
10 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff8067b0aa2 _dispatch_once_callout + 20
11 AppKit 0x7ff80b1fd060 -[NSWMWindowCoordinator initializeStageFramesIfNeeded] + 296
12 AppKit 0x7ff80a3b3701 -[NSWindow _commonInitFrame:styleMask:backing:defer:] + 888
13 AppKit 0x7ff80a3b2f77 -[NSWindow _initContent:styleMask:backing:defer:contentView:] + 1222
14 AppKit 0x7ff80a3b2aa9 -[NSWindow initWithContentRect:styleMask:backing:defer:] + 42
15 SwiftUI 0x7ff917f321e0 0x7ff91776f000 + 8139232
16 SwiftUI 0x7ff917a8e2f2 0x7ff91776f000 + 3273458
17 SwiftUI 0x7ff917bccfba 0x7ff91776f000 + 4579258
18 SwiftUI 0x7ff917f2ca8e 0x7ff91776f000 + 8116878
19 SwiftUI 0x7ff917f24a65 0x7ff91776f000 + 8084069
20 SwiftUI 0x7ff917f21540 0x7ff91776f000 + 8070464
21 SwiftUI 0x7ff91849e9f1 0x7ff91776f000 + 13826545
22 SwiftUICore 0x7ffb13103ea5 0x7ffb12c81000 + 4730533
23 SwiftUICore 0x7ffb13102e0f 0x7ffb12c81000 + 4726287
24 SwiftUI 0x7ff91849e903 0x7ff91776f000 + 13826307
25 SwiftUI 0x7ff91849bc1c 0x7ff91776f000 + 13814812
26 AppKit 0x7ff80a54f191 -[NSApplication _doOpenUntitled] + 422
27 AppKit 0x7ff80a4efc59 __58-[NSApplication(NSAppleEventHandling) _handleAEOpenEvent:]_block_invoke + 237
28 AppKit 0x7ff80a963818 __102-[NSApplication _reopenWindowsAsNecessaryIncludingRestorableState:withFullFidelity:completionHandler:]_block_invoke + 101
29 AppKit 0x7ff80a4ef6fa __97-[NSDocumentController(NSInternal) _autoreopenDocumentsIgnoringExpendable:withCompletionHandler:]_block_invoke_3 + 148
30 AppKit 0x7ff80a4eee8f -[NSDocumentController(NSInternal) _autoreopenDocumentsIgnoringExpendable:withCompletionHandler:] + 635
31 AppKit 0x7ff80a96373d -[NSApplication _reopenWindowsAsNecessaryIncludingRestorableState:withFullFidelity:completionHandler:] + 269
32 AppKit 0x7ff80a3a6259 -[NSApplication(NSAppleEventHandling) _handleAEOpenEvent:] + 529
33 AppKit 0x7ff80a3a5eb9 -[NSApplication(NSAppleEventHandling) _handleCoreEvent:withReplyEvent:] + 679
34 Foundation 0x7ff807a4b471 -[NSAppleEventManager dispatchRawAppleEvent:withRawReply:handlerRefCon:] + 307
35 Foundation 0x7ff807a4b285 _NSAppleEventManagerGenericHandler + 80
36 AE 0x7ff80e0e4e95 0x7ff80e0da000 + 44693
37 AE 0x7ff80e0e4723 0x7ff80e0da000 + 42787
38 AE 0x7ff80e0de028 aeProcessAppleEvent + 409
39 HIToolbox 0x7ff81217b836 AEProcessAppleEvent + 55
40 AppKit 0x7ff80a39ee6a _DPSNextEvent + 1725
41 AppKit 0x7ff80adf38b8 -[NSApplication(NSEventRouting) _nextEventMatchingEventMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue:] + 1290
42 AppKit 0x7ff80a38faa9 -[NSApplication run] + 610
43 AppKit 0x7ff80a362d34 NSApplicationMain + 823
44 SwiftUI 0x7ff9177a7da1 0x7ff91776f000 + 232865
45 SwiftUI 0x7ff917af0d40 0x7ff91776f000 + 3677504
46 SwiftUI 0x7ff917d8fef8 0x7ff91776f000 + 6426360
47 Crescendo CryptoTokenKit 0x10b1baf6e static HostApp.$main() + 30
48 Crescendo CryptoTokenKit 0x10b1bd2f9 main + 9 (HostApp.swift:24)
49 dyld 0x7ff8065c82cd start + 1805
Hi everyone,
I’ve been working on storing keys and passwords in the macOS Keychain using the Keychain Services API. Specifically, I’m leveraging SecAccessControlCreateWithFlags to bind items to access control flags, and overall, it’s been working smoothly.
I have a question regarding the .applicationPassword flag of SecAccessControlCreateWithFlags. While it successfully prompts the user to input a password, there are no apparent password rules, even a simple “1” is accepted.
My questions are:
Is there a way to enforce strong password requirements when using the .applicationPassword flag?
If enforcing strong passwords isn’t possible, is there an alternative approach to provide a predefined strong password during the creation process, bypassing the need for user input?
With SecAccessControlCreateWithFlags, I noticed the item isn’t stored in the traditional file-based Keychain but in an iOS-style Keychain, is there a way to store it in a file-based Keychain while marking it as unexportable?
I appreciate any insights or suggestions.
Thank you!
Neil