Is the pseudocode below thread-safe? Imagine that the Main thread sets the CAMetalLayer's drawableSize to a new size meanwhile the rendering thread is in the middle of rendering into an existing MTLDrawable which does still have the old size. Is the change of metalLayer.drawableSize thread-safe in the sense that I can present an old MTLDrawable which has a different resolution than the current value of metalLayer.drawableSize? I assume that setting the drawableSize property informs Metal that the next MTLDrawable offered by the CAMetalLayer should have the new size, right? Is it valid to assume that "metalLayer.drawableSize = newSize" and "metalLayer.nextDrawable()" are internally synchronized, so it cannot happen that metalLayer.nextDrawable() would produce e.g. a MTLDrawable with the old width but with the new height (or a completely invalid resolution due to potential race conditions)? func onWindowResized(newSize: CGSize) { // Called on the Main thread metalLayer.drawableSize = newSize } func onVsync(drawable: MTLDrawable) { // Called on a background rendering thread renderer.renderInto(drawable: drawable) }

Hello Everyone I am new here, I am testing game center integration and using a development build of my IOS game. I have set up a couple of achievements in app store connect, but when I trigger them in the game then they do not unlock or show up. Okay so i am signed into the game center with a sandbox account on a test advice. Is there anything else I need to configure, or do achievements usually only work after the game is released?. I will appreciate any guidance… Thanks in Advance!!!

How can one match the walls and floor of a given CapturedRoom ? The transform.eulerAngles of a floor z & y are always 0 ! And the polygons seems to have a different orientation than the walls. So how to figure out the rotation and match the one from the walls ?

Hi, I’m testing Unity’s Spaceship HDRP demo on iPhone 17 Pro Max and iPad Pro M4 (iOS 26.1). Everything renders correctly, and my custom MetalFX Spatial plugin initializes successfully — it briefly reports active scaling (e.g. 1434×660 → 2868×1320 at 50% scaling), then reverts to native rendering a few frames later. Setup: Xcode 16.1 (targeting iOS 18) Unity 2022.3.62f3 (HDRP) Metal backend Dynamic Resolution enabled in HDRP assets and cameras Relevant Xcode console excerpt: [MetalFXPlugin] MetalFX_Enable(True) called. [SpaceshipOptions] MetalFX enabled with HDRP dynamic resolution integration. [SpaceshipOptions] Disabled TAA for MetalFX Spatial. [SpaceshipOptions] Created runtime RenderTexture: 1434x660 [MetalFX] Spatial scaler created (1434x660 → 2868x1320). [MetalFX] Processed frame with scaler. [MetalFXPlugin] Sent RenderTexture (1434x660) to MetalFX. Output target 2868x1320. [SpaceshipOptions] MetalFX target set: 1434x660 [SpaceshipOptions] Camera targetTexture cleared after MetalFX handoff. It looks like HDRP clears the camera’s target texture right after MetalFX submits the frame, which causes it to revert to native rendering. Is there a recommended way to persist or rebind the MetalFX output texture when using HDRP on iOS? Unity doesn’t appear to support MetalFX in the Editor either: Thanks!

I have a game built in Unreal Engine 5.6 which uses tilt motion controls to rotate an object. I've restricted the app to only run in portrait for iPhone, and everything works fine, however for iPad I've had a few issues relating to multitasking and I can't seem to solve it. Forcing the app to portrait only still allows the app to run in landscape mode, but shows black bars either side of the game, and the axes for the motion controls are incorrect. X becomes Y and Y becomes X, and there's no way for my app to know which orientation it is because the container is still technically portrait. Allowing my game to run in all orientations makes the whole app more presentable, it doesn't add black bars and the game is still functional and I'm able to map the controls correctly because the game knows it's landscape rather than portrait. The problem with allowing my app to run in landscape mode is if multitasking is enabled on the ipad, you can resize the app to be portrait, and then I run into the same problem again where the game thinks it's portrait mode and all of the axes are wrong again. I tried getting the true orientation of the device rather than the scene, but the game is intended to be played flat so instead of returning the orientation of the OS the orientation is FaceUp, which doesn't help. I need to either disable multitasking or find a way of getting the orientation of the OS (not the scene or the device). I haven't found how to get the OS orientation so I've been trying to disable multitasking. I've got Requires Fullscreen true and UIApplicationSupportsMultipleScreens false in my info.plist but my iPad still seems to allow the window to be resized in landscape view. Opening the IOS workspace of my project Requires Fullscreen is ticked but under that it says "Supports Multiple Windows" and the arrow button next to it takes my to my info.plist values, but no indication of how I can change it. I'm using Unreal Engine 5.6 and Xcode 16.0. Xcode is old I know, but this version of unreal engine doesn't seem to support any newer.

I work on a team that provides an SDK for another game to handle various tasks like authentication. They are experiencing a case where devices using iOS 17 are failing to authenticate with GameCenter, receiving the message "The requested operation could not be completed because local player has not been authenticated." We imagine this is because they still have some setup to finish regarding GameCenter itself, and we're working with them to take care of that. However, on iOS 18, their app ends up waiting indefinitely for GameCenter authentication messages that it never receives. That's where we're puzzled. We expect them to have the same outcome regardless of OS version. We initiate GameCenter authentication by setting an authenticateHandler after some initial application setup. The handler has code to account for UI, errors, and successful authentication. On iOS 17, it's clear that it's getting called as expected because they receive an indication that the player isn't authenticated. But on iOS 18, it looks like the same handler code on iOS 18 isn't being called at all. Are there differences in how iOS 18 interacts with the authenticationHandler that we somehow aren't accounting for? Or is there potentially something else that we're doing incorrectly that is manifesting only on iOS 18? Here's a simplified version of our login function code (in Obj-C++). There is no OS-specific code, and the job that owns this function does stay in scope until after authentication is complete. void beginLogin() { // Snip: Check if the user is already logged in. // Snip: Prevent multiple concurrent calls to this function. auto authenticateHandler = ^(UIViewController* gcViewController, NSError* error) { if (gcViewController != nil) { // Snip: Display the UI } else if (error != nil) { // Snip: Handle the error. } else { if ([[GKLocalPlayer localPlayer] isAuthenticated]) { // Snip: Handle successful authentication. } else { // Snip: Handle other case. } } }; [[GKLocalPlayer localPlayer] setAuthenticateHandler: authenticateHandler]; }

Does anyone know if we will be able to airplay content from another Apple device, say an iPad or iPhone to the Vision Pro?

I just got the new iOS 26 beta, and I LOVE the games app, but it show all of my games, even from years back. Is there a way to remove games from your library on the app?

View Layout Add the following views in a view controller: Label View A, with a subview of the same size: MTKView A View B, with a subview of the same size: MTKView B Refresh Rates of Each View The label view refreshes at 60fps (driven by CADisplayLink). MTKView A and B refresh at 15fps. MTKView Implementation Details The corresponding CAMetalLayer's maximumDrawableCount is set to 2, changed to double buffering. The scheduling mechanism is modified; drawing is not driven by the internal loop but is done manually. The draw call is triggered immediately upon receiving a frame. self.metalView.enableSetNeedsDisplay = NO; self.metalView.paused = YES; A new high-priority queue is created for drawing, instead of handling it on the main queue. MTKView Latency Tracking The GPU completion time T1 is observed through the addCompletedHandler callback of the CommandBuffer. The presentation time T2 of the frame is observed through the addPresentedHandler callback of the currentDrawable in MTKView. Testing shows that T2 - T1 > 16.6ms (the Vsync period at 60Hz). This means that after the GPU rendering in MTLView is finished, the frame is not actually displayed at the next Vsync instruction but only at the Vsync instruction after that. I believe there is an extra 16.6ms of latency here, which I want to eliminate by adjusting the rendering mechanism. Observation from Instruments From Instruments, the Surface presentation aligns with the above test results. After the Metal encoder finishes, the Surface in Display switches only after the next-next Vsync instruction. See the image in the link for details. Questions According to a beginner's understanding, after MTKView's GPU rendering is finished, the next Vsync instruction should officially display (make it visible). However, this is not what is observed. Does the subview MTKView need to wait for another Vsync cycle to be drawn to the actual display buffer? The label updates its text at 60fps, so the entire interface should be displayed at 60fps. Is the content of MTKView not synchronized when the display happens? Explanation of the Reasoning Behind Some MTKView Code Details Changing from the default triple buffering to double buffering helps reduce the latency introduced by rendering. Not using MTKView's own scheduling mechanism but using manual triggering of the draw method is because MTKView's own scheduling mechanism is driven by CADisplayLink. Therefore, if a frame falls within a Vsync window, it needs to wait for the next Vsync window to trigger the draw operation, which introduces waiting latency.

Hey, I've been struggling with this for some days now. I am trying to write to a sparse texture in a compute shader. I'm performing the following steps: Set up a sparse heap and create a texture from it Map the whole area of the sparse texture using updateTextureMapping(..) Overwrite every value with the value "4" in a compute shader Blit the texture to a shared buffer Assert that the values in the buffer are "4". I have a minimal example (which is still pretty long unfortunately). It works perfectly when removing the line heapDesc.type = .sparse. What am I missing? I could not find any information that writes to sparse textures are unsupported. Any help would be greatly appreciated. import Metal func sparseTexture64x64Demo() throws { // ── Metal objects guard let device = MTLCreateSystemDefaultDevice() else { throw NSError(domain: "SparseNotSupported", code: -1) } let queue = device.makeCommandQueue()! let lib = device.makeDefaultLibrary()! let pipeline = try device.makeComputePipelineState(function: lib.makeFunction(name: "addOne")!) // ── Texture descriptor let width = 64, height = 64 let format: MTLPixelFormat = .r32Uint // 4 B per texel let desc = MTLTextureDescriptor() desc.textureType = .type2D desc.pixelFormat = format desc.width = width desc.height = height desc.storageMode = .private desc.usage = [.shaderWrite, .shaderRead] // ── Sparse heap let bytesPerTile = device.sparseTileSizeInBytes let meta = device.heapTextureSizeAndAlign(descriptor: desc) let heapBytes = ((bytesPerTile + meta.size + bytesPerTile - 1) / bytesPerTile) * bytesPerTile let heapDesc = MTLHeapDescriptor() heapDesc.type = .sparse heapDesc.storageMode = .private heapDesc.size = heapBytes let heap = device.makeHeap(descriptor: heapDesc)! let tex = heap.makeTexture(descriptor: desc)! // ── CPU buffers let bytesPerPixel = MemoryLayout<UInt32>.stride let rowStride = width * bytesPerPixel let totalBytes = rowStride * height let dstBuf = device.makeBuffer(length: totalBytes, options: .storageModeShared)! let cb = queue.makeCommandBuffer()! let fence = device.makeFence()! // 2. Map the sparse tile, then signal the fence let rse = cb.makeResourceStateCommandEncoder()! rse.updateTextureMapping( tex, mode: .map, region: MTLRegionMake2D(0, 0, width, height), mipLevel: 0, slice: 0) rse.update(fence) // ← capture all work so far rse.endEncoding() let ce = cb.makeComputeCommandEncoder()! ce.waitForFence(fence) ce.setComputePipelineState(pipeline) ce.setTexture(tex, index: 0) let threadsPerTG = MTLSize(width: 8, height: 8, depth: 1) let tgCount = MTLSize(width: (width + 7) / 8, height: (height + 7) / 8, depth: 1) ce.dispatchThreadgroups(tgCount, threadsPerThreadgroup: threadsPerTG) ce.updateFence(fence) ce.endEncoding() // Blit texture into shared buffer let blit = cb.makeBlitCommandEncoder()! blit.waitForFence(fence) blit.copy( from: tex, sourceSlice: 0, sourceLevel: 0, sourceOrigin: MTLOrigin(x: 0, y: 0, z: 0), sourceSize: MTLSize(width: width, height: height, depth: 1), to: dstBuf, destinationOffset: 0, destinationBytesPerRow: rowStride, destinationBytesPerImage: totalBytes) blit.endEncoding() cb.commit() cb.waitUntilCompleted() assert(cb.error == nil, "GPU error: \(String(describing: cb.error))") // ── Verify a few texels let out = dstBuf.contents().bindMemory(to: UInt32.self, capacity: width * height) print("first three texels:", out[0], out[1], out[width]) // 0 1 64 assert(out[0] == 4 && out[1] == 4 && out[width] == 4) } Metal shader: #include <metal_stdlib> using namespace metal; kernel void addOne(texture2d<uint, access::write> tex [[texture(0)]], uint2 gid [[thread_position_in_grid]]) { tex.write(4, gid); }

I have a question I guess more for the Apple team. But why are there no totally 3D experiences for the Vision Pro lineup? I know they have given us tools to implement unity 3D games into iPhone and I guess you can also build it in RealityKit. But why at this moment are 3D games limited to just iPad and iPhone and can't you bring that into Vision Pro? Just to explain. When I say a totally 3D game, I mean games like Gorn. I mean the Vision Pro is definitely powerful enough, but it just feels limited to tabletop games and AR games. Is this something Apple is thinking about implementing?

I'm using RealityView in my iOS game mxied with SwiftUI. For the following 2 example usages, the simulator will only render the first RealityView, and the second one is either super laggy or show a black model. Running on the real device is all good, just simualtor has this issue. Have a TabView and each tab has a RealityView. Have a root view and detail view connected via a push navigation, both root and detail have a RealityView. In the Simulator, the second RealityView is going to be very choppy and basically unusable, but on a real iPhone everything looks great. Is this a known simulator issue or I did something bad?

Hi! Using ARView in UIKit or through a UIViewRepresentable in SwiftUI, we can do: arView.debugOptions = [.showPhysics, .showStatistics] What is the equivalent in RealityView?

My IOS app generates pdf files. Every time my users open the generated pdf files, the autofill popup jumps out, but my pdf file is NOT for interacting. I'm here to ask if there's a way to mark my pdf files as "not a form", like in metadata or anywhere else?

Hi all, I've developed some code that enables an arcball camera interaction with my scene. I've done this using components and systems. The implementation feels a bit messy as I've got gesture code on my realityView, and then a bunch of other code that uses those gesture inputs in my component and system. Is there a demo app, or some example code that shows a nice way to encapsulate these things in to one item for custom cameras, something like Apple's .realityViewCameraControls(.orbit) If not can anyone recommend an approach to take?

Hello! I'm currently porting a videogame console emulator to iOS and I'm trying to make the renderer (tested on MacOS) work on iOS as well. The emulator core is written in C++ and uses metal-cpp for rendering, whereas the iOS frontend is written in Swift with SwiftUI. I have an Objective-C++ bridging header for bridging the Swift and C++ sides. On the Swift side, I create an MTKView. Inside the MTKView delegate, I run the emulator for 1 video frame and pass it the view's backing layer for it to render the final output image with. The emulator runs and returns, but when it returns I get a crash in Swift land (callstack attached below), inside objc_release, which indicates I'm doing something wrong with memory management. My bridging interface (ios_driver.h): #pragma once #include <Foundation/Foundation.h> #include <QuartzCore/QuartzCore.h> void iosCreateEmulator(); void iosRunFrame(CAMetalLayer* layer); Bridge implementation (ios_driver.mm): #import <Foundation/Foundation.h> extern "C" { #include "ios_driver.h" } <...> #define IOS_EXPORT extern "C" __attribute__((visibility("default"))) std::unique_ptr<Emulator> emulator = nullptr; IOS_EXPORT void iosCreateEmulator() { ... } // Runs 1 video frame of the emulator and IOS_EXPORT void iosRunFrame(CAMetalLayer* layer) { void* layerBridged = (__bridge void*)layer; // Pass the CAMetalLayer to the emulator emulator->getRenderer()->setMTKLayer(layerBridged); // Runs the emulator for 1 frame and renders the output image using our layer emulator->runFrame(); } My MTKView delegate: class Renderer: NSObject, MTKViewDelegate { var parent: ContentView var device: MTLDevice! init(_ parent: ContentView) { self.parent = parent if let device = MTLCreateSystemDefaultDevice() { self.device = device } super.init() } func mtkView(_ view: MTKView, drawableSizeWillChange size: CGSize) {} func draw(in view: MTKView) { var metalLayer = view.layer as! CAMetalLayer // Run the emulator for 1 frame & display the output image iosRunFrame(metalLayer) } } Finally, the emulator's render function that interacts with the layer: void RendererMTL::setMTKLayer(void* layer) { metalLayer = (CA::MetalLayer*)layer; } void RendererMTL::display() { CA::MetalDrawable* drawable = metalLayer->nextDrawable(); if (!drawable) { return; } MTL::Texture* texture = drawable->texture(); <rest of rendering follows here using the drawable & its texture> } This is the Swift callstack at the time of the crash: To my understanding, I shouldn't be violating ARC rules as my bridging header uses CAMetalLayer* instead of void* and Swift will automatically account for ARC when passing CoreFoundation objects to Objective-C. However I don't have any other idea as to what might be causing this. I've been trying to debug this code for a couple of days without much success. If you need more info, the emulator code is also on Github Metal renderer: https://github.com/wheremyfoodat/Panda3DS/blob/ios/src/core/renderer_mtl/renderer_mtl.cpp#L58-L68 Bridge implementation: https://github.com/wheremyfoodat/Panda3DS/blob/ios/src/ios_driver.mm Bridging header: https://github.com/wheremyfoodat/Panda3DS/blob/ios/include/ios_driver.h Any help is more than appreciated. Thank you for your time in advance.

Matchmaking rules https://developer.apple.com/documentation/gamekit/matchmaking-rules?language=objc AppStoreConnectApi rules https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appstoreconnectapi/rules?language=objc ・Environment Unity 6000.2.2f1 XCode 16.1 iOS 26 3 iPhones ・AppStoreConnectApi rules "type": "gameCenterMatchmakingRuleSets", "id": "f6a88caf-85db-42bf-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "attributes": { "referenceName": "co.mygame.RuleSets.GvERandom34", "ruleLanguageVersion": 1, "minPlayers": 3, "maxPlayers": 4 }, "type": "gameCenterMatchmakingRules", "id": "6afa68ce-4d2c-496f-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "attributes": { "referenceName": "GameVersion", "description": "Check Game Version. GvERandom34", "type": "COMPATIBLE", "expression": "requests[0].properties.gameVersion == requests[1].properties.gameVersion", "weight": null }, "type": "gameCenterMatchmakingQueues", "id": "7fb645ef-4eca-4510-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "attributes": { "referenceName": "co.mygame.que.GvERandom34", "classicMatchmakingBundleIds": [] }, ・Objective-C Execution code queueName = "co.mygame.que.GvERandom34" keyStr = "gameVersion " valueStr = "1.0" - (void)MatchQueueParamStr1Start:(NSString*)queueName keyStr:(NSString*)keyStr valueStr:(NSString*)valueStr { if (@available(iOS 17.2, tvOS 17.2, macOS 14.2, visionOS 1.1, *) == NO) { DBGLOG(@"MatchQueueParamStr1Start Not support."); return; } self->_matchMakingFlag = YES; self->_matchFinishFlag = NO; self->_myMatch = nil; GKMatchRequest *req = [[GKMatchRequest alloc] init]; if (@available(iOS 17.2, tvOS 17.2, macOS 14.2, visionOS 1.1, *)) { req.queueName = queueName; req.properties = @{keyStr: valueStr}; } [[GKMatchmaker sharedMatchmaker] findMatchForRequest:req withCompletionHandler: ^(GKMatch *match, NSError *error) { if (error) { [self SetupErrorInfo:error descriptionText:@"findMatchForRequest"]; } else if(match) { self->_myMatch = match; self->_myMatch.delegate = self; } self->_matchMakingFlag = NO; self->_matchFinishFlag = YES; }]; } ・ I'm trying to match with three devices. Matching doesn't work. 5 minutes later times out. What's the problem?

I’ve been trying to run Jurassic World Evolution 2 using the Game Porting Toolkit on macOS, but the game doesn’t launch and crashes immediately. Based on the error and research, it seems the issue is related to missing support for D3D12_TILED_RESOURCES_TIER_2 in the Metal API. If this is the case, does anyone know if support for tiled resources is planned for future updates of the toolkit? Or are there any potential workarounds for bypassing this limitation?

Imagine a native macOS app that acts as a "launcher" for a Java game.** For example, the "launcher" app might use the Swift Process API or a similar method to run the java command line tool (lets assume the user has installed Java themselves) to run the game. I have seen How to Enable Game Mode. If the native launcher app's Info.plist has the following keys set: LSApplicationCategoryType set to public.app-category.games LSSupportsGameMode set to true (for macOS 26+) GCSupportsGameMode set to true The launcher itself can cause Game Mode to activate if the launcher is fullscreened. However, if the launcher opens a Java process that opens a window, then the Java window is fullscreened, Game Mode doesn't seem to activate. In this case activating Game Mode for the launcher itself is unnecessary, but you'd expect Game Mode to activate when the actual game in the Java window is fullscreened. Is there a way to get Game Mode to activate in the latter case? ** The concrete case I'm thinking of is a third-party Minecraft Java Edition launcher, but the issue can also be demonstrated in a sample project (FB13786152). It seems like the official Minecraft launcher is able to do this, though it's not clear how. (Is its bundle identifier hardcoded in the OS to allow for this? Changing a sample app's bundle identifier to be the same as the official Minecraft launcher gets the behavior I want, but obviously this is not a practical solution.)

Hello! I need to "draw" a set of particles into the texture. It would be trivial in render encoder of course. However, I would like to implement the task in compute kernel. Every particle draw operation is expected to set 5 texels - "center" one and left/right/upper/lower. Particles can and will overlap, so concurrent draws are to be expected. I tried using texture atomics - atomic_store() to be more precise. This worked, albeit pretty slowly - too slow for my purpose. Just to test what would happen, I tried using normal texture write(). I was expecting to see some kind of visual artefacts, but to my surprise, it worked very well (and much faster). My question: is it safe? I understand that calling write() doesn't guarantee any ordering of the operations, so if multiple threads write to the same texel, the final value may come from any of those threads. But suppose all the threads were to write the very same color? Can I assume that the texel in question will have said color after the compute kernel finishes? I am using M2 Pro MacBook, but ideally I would love to get the answer for the all Apple Silicon devices. My texture format is R32Int (so as to be able to use atomics), but I could do with any single-channel format, the purpose of the texture is to be binary mask of sorts. Thanks!