We set the CVDisplayLink on macOS to 0 or 120, and get the following. This then clamps maximum refresh to 60Hz on the 120Hz ProMotion display on a MBP M2 Max laptop. How is this not fixed in 4 macOS releases? CoreVideo: currentVBLDelta returned 200000 for display 1 -- ignoring unreasonable value CoreVideo: [0x7fe2fb816020] Bad CurrentVBLDelta for display 1 is zero. defaulting to 60Hz.

I'm updating our app to support metal 4, but the metal 4 types don't seem to get recognized when targeting simulator. Is it known if metal 4 will be supported in the near future, or am I setting up the app wrong?

I am building a MacOS desktop app (https://anukari.com) that is using Metal compute to do real-time audio/DSP processing, as I have a problem that is highly parallelizable and too computationally expensive for the CPU. However it seems that the way in which I am using the GPU, even when my app is fully compute-limited, the OS never increases the power/performance state. Because this is a real-time audio synthesis application, it's a huge problem to not be able to take advantage of the full clock speeds that the GPU is capable of, because the app can't keep up with real-time. I discovered this issue while profiling the app using Instrument's Metal tracing (and Game tracing) modes. In the profiling configuration under "Metal Application" there is a drop-down to select the "Performance State." If I run the application under Instruments with Performance State set to Maximum, it runs amazingly well, and all my problems go away. For comparison, when I run the app on its own, outside of Instruments, the expensive GPU computation it's doing takes around 2x as long to complete, meaning that the app performs half as well. I've done a ton of work to micro-optimize my Metal compute code, based on every scrap of information from the WWDC videos, etc. A problem I'm running into is that I think that the more efficient I make my code, the less it signals to the OS that I want high GPU clock speeds! I think part of why the OS is confused is that in most use cases, my computation can be done using only a small number of Metal threadgroups. I'm guessing that the OS heuristics see that only a small fraction of the GPU is saturated and fail to scale up the power/clock state. I'm not sure what to do here; I'm in a bit of a bind. One possibility is that I intentionally schedule busy work -- spin threadgroups just to waste energy and signal to the OS that I need higher clock speeds. This is obviously a really bad idea, but it might work. Is there any other (better) way for my app to signal to the OS that it is doing real-time latency-sensitive computation on the GPU and needs the clock speeds to be scaled up? Note that game mode is not really an option, as my app also runs as an AU plugin inside hosts like Garageband, so it can't be made fullscreen, etc.

Hello. In the iOS app i'm working on we are very tight on memory budget and I was looking at ways to reduce our texture memory usage. However I noticed that comparing ASTC8x8 to ASTC12x12, there is no actual difference in allocated memory for most of our textures despite ASTC12x12 having less than half the bpp of 8x8. The difference between the two only becomes apparent for textures 1024x1024 and larger, and even in that case the actual texture data is sometimes only 60% of the allocation size. I understand there must be some alignment and padding going on, but this seems extreme. For an example scene in my app with astc12x12 for most textures there is over a 100mb difference in astc size on disk versus when loaded, so I would love to be able to recover even a portion of that memory. Here is some test code with some measurements i've taken using an iphone 11: for(int i = 0; i < 11; i++) { MTLTextureDescriptor *texDesc = [[MTLTextureDescriptor alloc] init]; texDesc.pixelFormat = MTLPixelFormatASTC_12x12_LDR; int dim = 12; int n = 2 << i; int mips = i+1; texDesc.width = n; texDesc.height = n; texDesc.mipmapLevelCount = mips; texDesc.resourceOptions = MTLResourceStorageModeShared; texDesc.usage = MTLTextureUsageShaderRead; // Calculate the equivalent astc texture size int blocks = 0; if(mips == 1) { blocks = n/dim + (n%dim>0? 1 : 0); blocks *= blocks; } else { for(int j = 0; j < mips; j++) { int a = 2 << j; int cur = a/dim + (a%dim>0? 1 : 0); blocks += cur*cur; } } auto tex = [objCObj newTextureWithDescriptor:texDesc]; printf("%dx%d, mips %d, Astc: %d, Metal: %d\n", n, n, mips, blocks*16, (int)tex.allocatedSize); } MTLPixelFormatASTC_12x12_LDR 128x128, mips 7, Astc: 2768, Metal: 6016 256x256, mips 8, Astc: 10512, Metal: 32768 512x512, mips 9, Astc: 40096, Metal: 98304 1024x1024, mips 10, Astc: 158432, Metal: 262144 128x128, mips 1, Astc: 1936, Metal: 4096 256x256, mips 1, Astc: 7744, Metal: 16384 512x512, mips 1, Astc: 29584, Metal: 65536 1024x1024, mips 1, Astc: 118336, Metal: 147456 MTLPixelFormatASTC_8x8_LDR 128x128, mips 7, Astc: 5488, Metal: 6016 256x256, mips 8, Astc: 21872, Metal: 32768 512x512, mips 9, Astc: 87408, Metal: 98304 1024x1024, mips 10, Astc: 349552, Metal: 360448 128x128, mips 1, Astc: 4096, Metal: 4096 256x256, mips 1, Astc: 16384, Metal: 16384 512x512, mips 1, Astc: 65536, Metal: 65536 1024x1024, mips 1, Astc: 262144, Metal: 262144 I also tried using MTLHeaps (placement and automatic) hoping they might be better, but saw nearly the same numbers. Is there any way to have metal allocate these textures in a more compact way to save on memory?

So I've been trying out GPTK with Elite Dangerous Horizons game and it looks like from what I can tell. The VRAM keeps going up until it goes over the limit where it drops the FPS to 1-3 FPS and then crashes the game. From the Performance HUD I can see that it looks like when using GPTK, the VRAM usage just keeps climbing and I never saw it drop down at all. I did some limited testing, and from that I think I can conclude that it is probably not a VRAM leak, but it might be caching it. The reason for this is because I noticed that if I went back to the area that I've been before. It won't increase the VRAM usage. So either there is something wrong with the freeing VRAM memory part, or it could be that GPTK might not be reporting the right amount of VRAM available to use? So maybe that's why it keeps allocating VRAM until it went out of memory and crashed the game. Just to test, I did try running the game with DXVK+MoltenVK combo, and I can see that it works just fine. VRAM is being freed up when it's no longer used. Is this a known issue in some games?

I have a Core Image filter in my app that uses Metal. I cannot compile it because it complains that the executable tool metal is not available, but I have installed it in Xcode. If I go to the "Components" section of Xcode Settings, it shows it as downloaded. And if I run the suggested command, it also shows it as installed. Any advice? Xcode Version Version 26.0 beta (17A5241e) Build Output Showing All Errors Only Build target Lessons of project StudyJapanese with configuration Light RuleScriptExecution /Users/chris/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/StudyJapanese-glbneyedpsgxhscqueifpekwaofk/Build/Intermediates.noindex/StudyJapanese.build/Light-iphonesimulator/Lessons.build/DerivedSources/OtsuThresholdKernel.ci.air /Users/chris/Code/SerpentiSei/Shared/iOS/CoreImage/OtsuThresholdKernel.ci.metal normal undefined_arch (in target 'Lessons' from project 'StudyJapanese') cd /Users/chris/Code/SerpentiSei/StudyJapanese /bin/sh -c xcrun\ metal\ -w\ -c\ -fcikernel\ \"\$\{INPUT_FILE_PATH\}\"\ -o\ \"\$\{SCRIPT_OUTPUT_FILE_0\}\"' ' error: error: cannot execute tool 'metal' due to missing Metal Toolchain; use: xcodebuild -downloadComponent MetalToolchain /Users/chris/Code/SerpentiSei/StudyJapanese/error:1:1: cannot execute tool 'metal' due to missing Metal Toolchain; use: xcodebuild -downloadComponent MetalToolchain Build failed 6/9/25, 8:31 PM 27.1 seconds Result of xcodebuild -downloadComponent MetalToolchain (after switching Xcode-beta.app with xcode-select) xcodebuild -downloadComponent MetalToolchain Beginning asset download... Downloaded asset to: /System/Library/AssetsV2/com_apple_MobileAsset_MetalToolchain/4d77809b60771042e514cfcf39662c6d1c195f7d.asset/AssetData/Restore/022-19457-035.dmg Done downloading: Metal Toolchain (17A5241c). Screenshots from Xcode Result of "Copy Information" Metal Toolchain 26.0 [com.apple.MobileAsset.MetalToolchain: 17.0 (17A5241c)] (Installed)