What determines whether the live caller ID call extension sends a /queries request with an EvaluationKey instead of an EvaluationKeyMetadata.Identifier? Is this behavior configurable through our app? In the live-callerid-lookup-example, the code checks if the PirRequest contains an EvaluationKey and uses it for evaluation if present; otherwise, it defaults to the uploaded key. However, during testing with the live caller ID extension, we observed that the client system (iPhone) consistently sends /queries requests using only EvaluationKeyMetadata.Identifier. Is it possible for the client to send queries with an EvaluationKey to reduce storage requirements? In the "Refresh the Data" section, it is mentioned that "The system periodically refreshes these parameters automatically." Could you provide more details on the specific timing or frequency of these automatic refreshes? For example, do factors such as Low Power Mode, power-saving mode, or a screen-locked state affect the frequency or occurrence of these updates?

I have tried everything to get the user field returned with Sign in flow and it never does, not for new users, not even if i create a new app! Working with Apple is so frustrating and you have to pay for it!! Referencing this page, I am using scope=name email. I have tried using + and %20 as the spacer and neither makes a difference. I have also tried setting response_type = code and code id_token (again with + and %20 as the spacer) which also doesn't make a difference. Always the id_token is returned and always the email, but never the user. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/sign_in_with_apple/sign_in_with_apple_js/incorporating_sign_in_with_apple_into_other_platforms#3332115 AUTHORIZE REQUEST https://appleid.apple.com/auth/authorize? { "response_type": "code", "client_id": "com.example.service", "scope": "name email", "state": "77264297-813c-4738-83ef-f1b77daea04c", "redirect_uri": "https://example.com/auth/apple/callback", "code_challenge_method": "S256", "code_challenge": "2SJCneEpjKcN.....xIIHnpqcvjK_Y0s", "access_type": "offline", "nonce": "1734523662", "response_mode": "form_post" } TOKEN REQUEST https://appleid.apple.com/auth/token? { "grant_type": "authorization_code", "code": "c870aaec987a14.....dqakaGP4Yn1nH3dnPgww", "client_id": "com.hikesync.service", "client_secret": "eyJhbGciOiJFUzI....3izij6dojYfdV6JMdbQPx3sOA", "redirect_uri": "https://hikesync.com/auth/apple/callback", "code_verifier": "38hHUC....mYuE0zfYVNTycg" } RESPONSE { "access_token": "a2b70e12d38b446....4hA7-RLNj0ifU5Q", "token_type": "Bearer", "expires_in": 3600, "refresh_token": "rb4ed9be2b4024......w5RWjVFUQ", "id_token": "eyJraWQiOiJyQlJmV.......0Df0ihEJiA" } JWT { "iss": "https://appleid.apple.com", "aud": "SERVICE_ID", "exp": 1734606699, "iat": 1734520299, "sub": "000000.f7f7c0ac.....db9fad7e19.1111", "nonce": "NONCE", "at_hash": "NAfjmciTi2NtmPYIMAgjig", "email": "abc123@privaterelay.appleid.com", "email_verified": true, "is_private_email": true, "auth_time": 1734520297, "nonce_supported": true }

Hi there, I've encountered a file permission bug in iOS 18.1.1 when using FileManager.default.copyItem(at:to:) to copy files from an iCloud shared folder to the app sandbox. This issue occurs under the following conditions: The source file resides in an iCloud shared folder. The iCloud shared folder is owned by another iCloud user and shared with read-only permissions. The app copies the file to its sandbox using the copyItem(at:to:) method. Observed Behavior: After copying the file to the app sandbox, the original file's read-only permissions are propagated to the copied file. This results in an inability to delete the copied file from the app sandbox, with the following error message: NSCocoaErrorDomain, Code 513: "The file couldn’t be removed because you don’t have permission to access it." Steps to Reproduce: Access a shared iCloud folder owned by another user with read-only permissions. Copy a file from this folder to the app sandbox using FileManager.default.copyItem(at:to:). Attempt to delete the copied file within the app sandbox. Workaround: Until this issue is resolved, the bug can be avoided by initializing the UIDocumentPickerViewController with the asCopy: true parameter: UIDocumentPickerViewController(forOpeningContentTypes: contentTypes, asCopy: true) This ensures that the copied file does not inherit the original permissions from the shared source file. Example Project: To reproduce the issue and observe the error, I’ve created a sample project hosted on GitHub: https://github.com/giomurru/FileDeletePermissionBug This project provides step-by-step instructions for testing and reproducing the bug. Environment: iOS/iPadOS Version: 18.1.1 Devices: [iPhone 15, iPad 9th Gen] Development Tool: Xcode 16.1 I hope this helps Apple engineers and other developers experiencing the same issue. Feedback or additional insights would be appreciated. Giovanni

Hello, I am encountering an issue with user-generated files stored in the Documents directory on an iPhone 11 running iOS 18.2. The problem occurs as follows: 1.The app generates and saves files in the Documents directory using FileManager. 2.These files are successfully saved and remain accessible while the app is running. 3.After restarting the app, the files appear to have been deleted from the Documents directory. I have confirmed that: 1.The files are being saved to the correct location (Documents directory) and can be accessed during the current app session and from iExplorer. 2.The app is not explicitly deleting these files during shutdown or restart. 3.This behavior is consistent across multiple app restarts.

Hello, I am encountering an issue with user-generated files stored in the Documents directory on an iPhone 11 running iOS 18.2. The problem occurs as follows: 1.The app generates and saves files in the Documents directory using FileManager. 2.These files are successfully saved and remain accessible while the app is running. 3.After restarting the app, the files appear to have been deleted from the Documents directory. I have confirmed that: 1.The files are being saved to the correct location (Documents directory) and can be accessed during the current app session. 2.The app is not explicitly deleting these files during shutdown or restart. 3.This behavior is consistent across multiple app restarts.

Does any ont encountered such crash? It only occured on iOS18 device. Application Specific Information: *** Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInternalInconsistencyException', reason: '_endUndoGroupRemovingIfEmpty:: _UITextUndoManager 0x30d3bca50 is in invalid state, endUndoGrouping called with no matching begin UserInfo:(null)' Pthread id: 2420148 Thread 0 Crashed: 0 CoreFoundation __exceptionPreprocess + 164 1 libobjc.A.dylib objc_exception_throw + 88 2 Foundation -[NSUndoManager endUndoGrouping] + 0 3 Foundation __NSFirePerformWithOrder + 296 4 CoreFoundation __CFRUNLOOP_IS_CALLING_OUT_TO_AN_OBSERVER_CALLBACK_FUNCTION__ + 36 5 CoreFoundation __CFRunLoopDoObservers + 552 6 CoreFoundation __CFRunLoopRun + 788 7 CoreFoundation CFRunLoopRunSpecific + 588 8 GraphicsServices GSEventRunModal + 164 9 UIKitCore -[UIApplication _run] + 816 10 UIKitCore UIApplicationMain + 340 11 application main (main.m:39) 12 (null) 0x00000001abfecde8 0x0 + 7180570088

Hello, is there any fix for this topic ? [https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255892202) Any hints would be much appreciated. :) G

I am having troubles placing a model inside a volumetric window. I have a model - just a simple cube created in Reality Composer Pro that is 0.2m on a side and centered at the origin - and I want to display it in a volumetric window that is 1.0m on a side while preserving the cube's origin 0.2m size. The small cube seems to be flush against the back and top of the larger volumetric window. Is it possible to initially position the model inside the volume? For example, can the model be placed flush against the bottom and front of the volumetric window? (note: the actual use case is wanting to place 3D terrain (which tends to be mostly flat like a pizza box) flush against the bottom of the volumetric window)

I have a UIApplicationDelegate, where I want to terminate a live activity (in dynamic island) in applicationWillTerminate. However, ending an activity is asynchronous. When I end it within a Task, it's never called.

I am working on a Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) project using the nRF52840 Development Kit (DK), which has been reconfigured to simulate an nRF52805 chip. The firmware is based on Nordic Semiconductor's ble_app_hids_keyboard example, with modifications to implement a BLE HID Gamepad. I am using the S113 SoftDevice and have successfully tested the functionality with Android devices. The gamepad is recognized as a HID device, and it works as expected on Android, verified using the hardwareTester website. However, when I connect the gamepad to an iPhone via BLE, the same hardwareTester website does not respond as it does on Android, indicating that the iPhone does not recognize the device as a gamepad. The BLE connection is established successfully, but it seems iOS does not interpret the HID report descriptor or the BLE HID service correctly. I suspect there might be compatibility issues with the HID descriptor or the GATT attributes for iOS-specific BLE HID requirements. I would like to have some help.

I'm using Transaction.environment to determine server behavior. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/storekit/apptransaction/environment https://developer.apple.com/documentation/storekit/appstore/environment I gather this information on the app using StoreKit and then send it to the server: originalTransactionId = transaction.originalID originalTransactionEnvironment = transaction.environment When testing within Xcode, on a simulator, the value sent to the server for originalTransactionEnvironment is Xcode - as expected. When testing on a device using a TestFlight build, the value sent to the server for originalTransactionEnvironment is undefined/nil. I expected it to be Sandbox - and later in production it should be Production. Most importantly, the value sent to the server for originalTransactionId in the TestFlight version is not undefined/nil - it is the value I expected it would be. The transaction was originally for a subscription purchase, if that makes a difference. So the transaction is available, and information like originalID is also available. Why is transaction.environment not available? What is the behavior in production?

I'm trying to create a link from a restaurant annotation on a map in my app (created using MapKit) that will open the Apple Maps app on an iphone. I've been using the Restaurant name, telephone number, and coordinates and cannot get applemaps to open the enhanced page (which contains photographs and customer reviews and is much more descriptive than the page that is opening, which only shows the location on a map with the phone number and coordinates. It is not that descriptive, and I'm trying to create a request that will make it very easy to jump back and forth between my app and the enhanced page on apple maps. here's what I'm using in my request: " private func openInAppleMaps() { let coordinate = CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: restaurant.latitude, longitude: restaurant.longitude) let placemark = MKPlacemark(coordinate: coordinate) let mapItem = MKMapItem(placemark: placemark) mapItem.name = restaurant.name if let phone = restaurant.telephone1 { mapItem.phoneNumber = phone } mapItem.openInMaps(launchOptions: [MKLaunchOptionsShowsTrafficKey: true]) } }" the entire file is attached. Any help or advice would be much appreciated. RestaurantCallOutBox.swift

Hello, I'm currently migrating my app location service to use the new CLLocationUpdate.Updates. I'm trying to understand what can fail in this AsyncSequence. Based on the previous CLError, I thought authorisation was one of them for example but it turns out that this is handled by the CLLocationUpdate where we can check different properties. So, is there a list of errors available somewhere? Thanks Axel, @alpennec

Hello all 👋 I'm getting unexpected behavior when testing FinanceKit for my app and was hoping to get assistance. Pre-reqs (defined at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/financekit): I've been given the FinanceKit entitlement I have the com.apple.developer.financekit entitlement set to financial-data I also have NSFinancialDataDescription set in Info.plist. I am targeting iOS 17.4 (a physical device) When I call FinanceStore.shared.requestAuthorization(), I immediately get a denied status without any alert dialogs. No data about my app is listed in Settings > Privacy & Security > Wallet Any idea what else is needed here? Thanks so much for the help! Code import SwiftUI import FinanceKit @main struct myApp: App { var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() } } } struct ContentView: View { @State private var status: AuthorizationStatus? @State private var dataAvail: Bool? var body: some View { VStack { Text("Data available \(String(describing: dataAvail))") Text("Auth status \(String(describing: status))") Button("Get Status") { Task{ dataAvail = FinanceStore.isDataAvailable(.financialData) status = try await FinanceStore.shared.authorizationStatus() } }.buttonStyle(.borderedProminent) Button("Request Auth") { Task{ do{ status = try await FinanceStore.shared.requestAuthorization() }catch{ print(error) } } }.buttonStyle(.borderedProminent) } .padding() } } #Preview { ContentView() } app.entitlements: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>com.apple.developer.financekit</key> <array> <string>financial-data</string> </array> </dict> </plist> Info.plist: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>NSFinancialDataDescription</key> <string>Budget across all your accounts</string> </dict> </plist> VIdeo demo:

I am building a watchOS app with iOS companion app. The watch app needs to track the heart rate during the night or while user is sleeping. And the desired frequency of measurement is 0.2Hz (every 5 seconds) For this I am using the HKWorkout mode with mindAndBody session. While it works fine, One of the main issue is: after about 6-7 hours of usage, the battery on the watch drains between 40% (Series 9) and 100% (series 7, I think) My questions: Are there any other option to track user's heart rate without workout, while the app could be in background? Another side effect of this workout mode is, Even if we choose not to save the workout in HealthKit, the Activity rings gets populated by this mindAndBody session, which makes it when the user is waking up, the bar is already full, This is not desired. Is there any option to specify for ActivityRing skips this? Highly appreciate any help in advance. Cheers - Prakash

We currently use the HKCategoryValueMenstrualFlow enum to determine the type of menstrual flow: light, medium, etc. a user is having. We also use this enum in determining if it's an actual period day. The Problem I see HKCategoryValueMenstrualFlow was recently deprecated but has not been replaced by another data type. Are there plans to replace/update it with another data type? When or at what point in the future will this deprecation cause a problem in my code?

Hello, dear engineer: The UWB Accessory used by my APP has inconsistent code callbacks on iOS17 and iOS18. I have connected multiple UWB Accessory by Accessory Single Configuration Data (UUID: 95e8d9d5-d8ef-4721-9a4e-807375f53328) in the APP. In iOS17.5.1, the unconnected Accessory calls the func session in the NiSessionDelegate (_ session: NISession, didRemove nearbyObjects: [NINearbyObject], "reason: NINearbyObject RemovalReason)," reason is the timeout. iOS18.0.1 does not call didRemove and fails to connect automatically after 10 minutes on the disconnected Accessory. iOS18.2 does not call didRemove. After 10 minutes, when the Accessory is not connected, it automatically connects and starts ranging. Therefore, I would like to ask what is updated in iOS18 UWB? Is there a document for reference, or can you provide the callback performance of each iOS version for UWB? The code is as follows: niConfiguration = try NINearbyAccessoryConfiguration(data: Data(AccessoryUwbConfigData)) uwbSession.run(niConfiguration)

Hi, I'm not too good with terminal stuff, but when I looked at activity monitor, my corespotlightd was using too much of my cpu. I decided to look up solutions on google and stumbled upon this: https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/675482. I tried some of the commands, and I closed the terminal while sudo was still running because I was getting impatient. Somehow, before I even realized it, I was logged out of my Apple ID and my desktop and downloads files were completely gone. For some reason, my applications are still the same, which makes me wonder if some of the files or folders I had before can still be recoverable. I checked time machine, and I wasn't able to recover anything. How cooked am I? I've lost all of my university work and some other pictures and stuff that I thought would never be damaged if I had it locally. Would appreciate any type of help. Thanks.

I am developing a macOS word-processing app that should be distributed via the Apple App Store. Some of the app's functions like generating HTML and PDF exports should be automatable via Shortcuts and via shell scripts. To support the latter, I plan to include a command line tool inside the app that can be called from the Terminal or a shell script. The tool should be able to instruct the main app to then perform the desired commands. A well-known AppStore app that uses this design is BBEdit which also contains multiple command line tools that offer functionality from the main app to users of the Terminal. My technical questions now are: Should the command line tool executable be sandboxed and if yes, how? Even after many trials, I have not found a way to make a working sandboxed command line tool. If a sandboxed tool is started from the Terminal, it is immediately terminated with an exception in _libsecinit_appsandbox.cold.12. I am aware of the Apple developer documentation article Embedding A Helper Tool In A Sandboxed App, but it addresses a different architecture in which the helper tool is started from the main app and therefore is able to inherit its sandbox. BBEdit is only sandboxing the main app, but not its embedded command line tools and is still allowed in the App Store. Is this the way to go for me as well or does BBEdit get some special treatment in the App Store? How can the command line tool pass the permission to access files to the main app? As my main app is sandboxed, it needs explicit permission from the user to be able to access files. Users of a command line tool give this permission by providing file paths as arguments. How can I pass these permissions along to the main app? BBEdit is able to do this even when the user has not given it full-disk access. I know that it is using Apple Events for the communication between the command line tool and the main app, but I am not sure how this allows to pass permissions. Can anyone shed light on how to implement a solution here? Thanks!

First, for the  employees reading, I filed FB14844573 over the weekend, because this is a reproducible panic or hang. whee I ran our stress tests for an entire long weekend, and my machine panicked, due to mbufs. Normally, I tell my coworkers that we can't really do anything to cause a panic -- but we're doing network things, so this is an exception. I started periodically testing the mbufs while the tests were running -- netstat -m | grep 'mbufs in use' -- and noticed that in fact they were going up, and never decreasing. Even if I killed our code and uninstalled the extensions. (They're increasing at about ~4mbufs/sec.) Today I confirmed that this only happens if we include UDP packets: let udpRule = NENetworkRule(destinationNetwork: host, prefix: 0, protocol: .UDP) let tcpRule = NENetworkRule(destinationNetwork: host, prefix: 0, protocol: .TCP) ... settings.includedNetworkRules = [udpRule, tcpRule] If I comment out that udpRule, part, mbufs don't leak. Our handleNewUDPFlow(:, initialRemoteEndpoint:) method checks to see if the application is a friendly one, and if so it returns false. If it isn't friendly, we want to block QUIC packets: if let host = endpoint as? NWHostEndpoint { if host.port == "80" || host.port == "443" { // We need to open it and then close it flow.open(withLocalEndpoint: nil) { error in Self.workQueue.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + 0.01) { let err = error ?? POSIXError(POSIXErrorCode.ECONNABORTED) flow.closeReadWithError(err) flow.closeWriteWithError(err) } } return true } } return false Has anyone else run into this? I can't see that it's my problem at that point, since the only thing we do with UDP flows is to either say "we don't want it, you handle it" or "ok sure, we'll take it but then let's close it immediately".