Hi everyone, I’m implementing subscriptions using StoreKit v2, and I’ve noticed a behavior change starting with iOS 26.1. I’d like to ask if anyone else has experienced the same issue. ■ Issue Immediately after purchasing a new subscription, the value of auto_renew_status (or autoRenewStatus) returned in the receipt is 0 (auto-renew OFF). This issue occurs on iOS 26.1. On iOS 26.0 and earlier, the same parameter returned 1 (auto-renew ON) right after purchase. Sometimes, after executing a “restore” operation, the value changes to 1 later. Since we’ve been using this parameter to determine whether a user’s subscription is active or not, the current behavior is causing some difficulties on our end. ■ Questions Has anyone else observed this issue (where autoRenewStatus is 0 immediately after purchase on iOS 26.1 or later)? How are you handling or working around this behavior in your implementation? If autoRenewStatus is unreliable, we’re considering determining the subscription state based on receipt fields instead. Would this approach be reasonable? "status" is 1 (indicates active subscription) "expire_time" is in the future "deleted_at" is null If anyone has encountered the same behavior or knows of any Apple-recommended implementation approach, I’d really appreciate your insights. Thank you! 🙏

A customer of mine signed up for a free trial. I got a apple server notification with notification type DID_RENEW. What does that mean? Does that mean that they will be charged the subscription price now?

Previously I could get the sub package information after each payment via webhook but today I didn't get it. What happened? My webhook url: https://r-connect-api-dev.mystg-env.com/webhook/appstore/notification/v2

Hi, Using StoreKit 2 with App Store Server notifications like so: User selects a purchase App calls Product.purchase() If successful, App Store notifies our backend with the transaction details, importantly with a UUID for the transaction ID. This works fine, but when I try to test contingent pricing via the handy StoreKit config Transaction Manager in Xcode by creating a PurchaseIntent if I then complete the purchase in the app the Transaction ID is sequential, (0 for the first, 1 for the second etc), which doesn't work for us as the backend might already have that ID stored so the purchase never completes. If I disable the config file it works fine, but then I can't use the Transaction Manager debug tool. Is there a way to override the ID of a custom transaction that's created via the StoreKit configuration? Thanks

Is the following subscription cancellation flow possible for an iOS in-app subscription? (Note: This is during the feature planning stage, not actual app deployment.) Planned user flow: User taps the “Cancel Subscription” button Display a “Wait a moment!” screen showing how much the user has enjoyed BFLIX content (to encourage retention) User taps “Proceed to Cancel” Collect cancellation reason from the user Redirect the user to the Apple subscription management page to complete cancellation Can this flow be implemented under Apple’s current in-app purchase and App Store Review guidelines?

I've been trying to make my app available on the App Store for a month now, but I can't because the signatures I created don't appear in the sandbox app. I did all the configuration in the store and in the app. I tested the same code in another app with signatures and it was loaded, but the signature for that specific app doesn't appear. I've tried contacting Apple support, but they can't help me. It almost seems like it's on purpose. I'm treated like crap and they don't even give me an explanation about what's happening. Can anyone help me?

アプリに課金を実装しようと思うのですが、もし不正利用された場合、アプリ側は基本的にApp Storeを通じて対応するよう案内するのが一般的と思いますが、Apple ID不正利用時とクレジットカード不正利用時で、アプリ側が行う標準的な対応プロセスは変わるのか教えていただきたいです。 また下記内容は標準的な対応プロセスとして問題ないでしょうか？
 ■Apple ID不正利用時 → ユーザー自身がAppleサポートに連絡し、パスワード変更・二段階認証の設定・不正購入の返金申請などを行うよう案内する。 ■クレジットカード不正利用時 → まずカード会社への連絡を促すが、アプリ内決済に関してはAppleのカスタマーサポート経由で返金や調査手続きを案内する 不正利用されたユーザーへの対応に備えて、アプリ側が考慮すべきことがあれば教えてください。

Hi Friends, I have an iOS app, which uses around 500 in app purchases for various modules. I am using StoreKit for in app purchase, now trying to migrate this to StoreKit 2. I am using Product.products(for:) method to fetch all the products by sending identifiers of all the 500 In app purchases. In response, I am getting details of only 160 products, the method is not returning remaining in app purchases. What could be the reason for this behaviour, how to get rid of the issue? May be is this the issue will happen only on TestFlight? If someone from Apple assures about it, we have plan to submit the app. Please advise, Thank you.

我正在通过集成app-store-server-library-java来实现 iap服务端校验。我参照了官网提供的Verification Usage 的代码，运行的时候异常信息如下： at com.apple.itunes.storekit.verification.ChainVerifier.verifyChainWithoutCaching(ChainVerifier.java:98) at com.apple.itunes.storekit.verification.ChainVerifier.verifyChain(ChainVerifier.java:71) at com.apple.itunes.storekit.verification.SignedDataVerifier.decodeSignedObject(SignedDataVerifier.java:186) at com.apple.itunes.storekit.verification.SignedDataVerifier.verifyAndDecodeTransaction(SignedDataVerifier.java:72) 我的代码如下： import com.apple.itunes.storekit.model.ResponseBodyV2DecodedPayload; import com.apple.itunes.storekit.verification.SignedDataVerifier; import com.apple.itunes.storekit.verification.VerificationException; import com.auth0.jwt.JWT; import com.auth0.jwt.interfaces.DecodedJWT; import java.io.FileInputStream; import java.io.FileNotFoundException; import java.io.InputStream; import java.util.Base64; import java.util.Set; public class ExampleVerification { public static void main(String[] args) throws FileNotFoundException { String bundleId = "com.example"; Environment environment = Environment.SANDBOX; Set<InputStream> rootCAs = Set.of( new FileInputStream("AppleRootCA-G3.cer"), new FileInputStream("AppleRootCA-G2.cer") ); Long appAppleId = null; // appAppleId must be provided for the Production environment SignedDataVerifier signedPayloadVerifier = new SignedDataVerifier(rootCAs, bundleId, appAppleId, environment, true); String appTransactionJWS = "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.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.2ZO5xsx-yywP4IyaDz4KQ3mq181ZGwlX2uANSm-kHq50KIdMMUDveMsCrcZmHdzLH2rpfPsXKaIMdM25Hdcuuw"; DecodedJWT unverifiedJWT = JWT.decode(appTransactionJWS); String header = unverifiedJWT.getHeader(); System.out.println(new String(Base64.getDecoder().decode(header))); try { signedPayloadVerifier.verifyAndDecodeTransaction(appTransactionJWS); } catch (VerificationException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } 查看了ChainVerifier.java 源代码，发现 private static final int EXPECTED_CHAIN_LENGTH = 3; // <--- 关键常量 // ... PublicKey verifyChainWithoutCaching(String[] certificates, boolean performRevocationChecking, Date effectiveDate) throws VerificationException { // ... 解析证书代码 ... if (parsedCertificates.size() != EXPECTED_CHAIN_LENGTH) { throw new VerificationException(VerificationStatus.INVALID_CHAIN_LENGTH); // <--- 抛出异常点 } // ... 后续验证代码 ... } appTransactionJWS是来自客户端的沙盒环境。 我发现沙盒环境的jws总是包含一个证书，而后端验证又必须要求三个证书，请问这个问题如何解决。

Hello everyone! We are observing a significant number of failures in the fetch of the products with StoreKit1, meaning that in a completely random way, some product identifiers are considered invalid in the response that we receive from Apple, and after some minutes these products are considered once again valid. The issue started on Thursday 04/24 around 12.00 am (UTC + 02.00) and from our dashboard we can clearly see the trend of these failures has some spikes at precise times. I am attaching a view that we use for monitoring purposes showing this trend, considering the data of this week. We are noticing this problem on multiple developer accounts and on multiple apps, which is leading us to think it could be an issue in the Apple backend processing the request. In our case, the apps are not launched correctly until all the products are fetched, and therefore the impact of this problem is very high. Is anyone experiencing something similar or do you have logs which allows you to identify such issues? The issue happens only in production, while in debug and TestFlight environment everything works well. Thank you for your support

I have been receiving beta software from the iPad App Store, despite not being enrolled in a beta program. Additionally, I do not have TestFlight or the Feedback app installed on my device. There are no certificates or profiles displayed either. I am using the App Store app that comes preinstalled on my device (note that I am not located in Europe). My iPad has been experiencing significant bugs, including numerous screen glitches and periods of sluggishness. Furthermore, numerous applications have crashed frequently. I was able to confirm that I was receiving beta software because the crash reports include beta identifier numbers. According to Apple documentation regarding analytic reports, a beta identifier will only be visible for beta applications. anyone know what could be going on or how to fix this?

I have a renewing monthly subscription in my app and recently added upgrade possibilities to yearly and 6 month subscriptions. Those new subscriptions were reviewed, approved and published to App Store. I'm showing a modal for users in the app from where they can upgrade their subscription. Upgrading was tested with real devices on Sandbox and TestFlight. There has been successful purchases through the in app modal in production app, and directly upgrading from App Store. However, for some users there seems to happen a failed transaction with paymentCancelled error code during the upgrade. The IAP is still successful, their subscription is upgraded and they haven't voluntarily canceled the IAP. The localized description of the error is "Toimintoa ei voitu suorittaa. (Virhe 2 kohteessa SKErrorDomain.)" which translates to "The operation could not be completed. (Error 2 in SKErrorDomain.)" These users have various iPhones (iPhone 12 Pro, iPhone 14 Pro, iPhone 15 Pro, iPhone 16 Pro) with up to date iOS versions (>= 18.3.1). I'm receiving DID_CHANGE_RENEWAL_PREF (UPGRADE) server notification of these purchases on my server. I haven't been able to reproduce this error myself. Any ideas why StoreKit might fail the transaction with paymentCancelled error but still successfully upgrade the subscription?

According to the App Store Server API documentation , https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appstoreserverapi/price the price field "shows the total amount of the transaction for the quantity the customer purchased." However, in actual transaction notifications and responses from App Store Server API, the price field appears to represent the unit price, not the total price. For consumable in-app purchases with quantity > 1, the price field equals the unit price of a single item. The total user payment is only correct after multiplying by the quantity. When quantity > 1, the actual amount paid by the user only matches price × quantity, which contradicts the documentation. Please confirm whether the price field is intended to be: The unit price of a single item (requiring multiplication by quantity), or The total price including all quantities (as currently documented). If the former is correct, please update the documentation to clarify that the value represents the unit price, not the total amount.

Use the following method to fetch： let appProducts = try await Product.products(for: productIdentifiers) The following checks have been carried out ✅ Must-check points App ID capabilities Subscription product status (ready to submit) Why The result is an empty array?

Hello All, We continue to receive post backs for campaigns which were run 6 months back. Our understanding is post back window is only 3 months, so checking to see if this is expected or any documentation will help. We are on SKAN4.0

When I test subscibe in sandbox，IOS says this transaction need to request parent’s approval。But this is a sandbox account，it don't have any family members

Hello! We are implementing consumable IAP for iOS using StoreKit 2 together with our own server backend. Our happy path looks like this: 1. Call /prepare on our server • We only allow one purchase at a time, so this fails if a pending transaction already exists. 2. Call /purchase via StoreKit 3. If successful, call /complete on our server 4. Call .finish() on the Transaction ⸻ The Problem Some users report being charged by Apple but not receiving coins. I suspect this happens in rare cases where the purchase flow throws an exception: • Every time we throw, we immediately cancel the transaction on our server. • However, some errors may actually be temporary. StoreKit seems to recover by later sending an update through Transactions.updates. • When that happens, since the transaction was already canceled on our server, we cannot match it. As a result, we just call .finish() without granting consumables. ⸻ Additional Observations From user logs, the issue tends to appear when the following errors are reported: • リクエストを完了できません。 • Triggered by: StoreKit.notEntitled • Triggered by: StoreKit.unknown • ヘルパーアプリケーションと通信できませんでした。 I was not able to reproduce the last one, even when testing all possible StoreKit configuration errors. Some sources suggest this may be a rare case where the app cannot communicate with the App Store itself. Additionally, affected users often seem to be using non-standard payment methods (PayPay, gift cards, carrier billing, etc.) rather than credit cards. ⸻ My Question What is the best practice for handling StoreKitError and PurchaseError? Specifically: • Should some of these errors be treated as temporary instead of final? • How should we ensure users always receive their consumables in such cases? ⸻ Code do { let result = try await wrapper.product.purchase() switch result { case .success(let result): let transaction = try StoreKitVerifier.checkVerified(result) let iOSPurchase = IOSPurchase(transaction: transaction, jws: result.jwsRepresentation) return .Success(purchase: iOSPurchase) case .userCancelled: return .Canceled() case .pending: return .Pending() @unknown default: return .Error( message: "Purchase result doesn't match with anything. This must not be executed") } } catch { return .Error(message: error.localizedDescription) }

My app has in app purchase for subscriptions, available in many countries. When using Sandbox App Store accounts on TestFlight with a locale different from my own in the iOS 26 RC, I'm getting incorrect currency coming back from Product.products(for: identifiers), and so my app displays the wrong price for the locale. However, the actual Apple Pay buy sheet shows the proper currency symbol and currency amount. This did not happen on prior versions of iOS. Is anyone else experiencing this?

What is the expected behavior for App Receipts and ASSN v2 notifications when a subscription is set to "Remove from Sale"? I tried to test this in Sandbox, but the "Remove from Sale" setting in App Store Connect doesn't seem to affect the Sandbox environment. For existing subscribers, what happens in the receipt? Does auto_renew_status change to 0 and is expiration_intent populated immediately? Also, which notificationType is sent via ASSN v2?

I'm trying to understand the IAP development process. I created my first Product on App Store Connect and am trying to build my app to use it. However it keeps failing with "Invalid product ID.". From what I've read, this is because the product has not yet gone through review. But what I don't understand is, of course it hasn't gone through review yet, because trying to use it in any capacity fails, even though I'm using a real physical device and using a Sandbox User. Is this the correct workflow? It seems very backwards that I have to submit the product for review, even before I know how it's going to be used. I'm still building the screen for the product page, and haven't even started touching any backend APIs, yet it's asking for screenshots. Am I misunderstanding something here?