We have observed an internet access issue after the device enters idle mode on iOS 26 beta 9. Although the Ivanti Secure Access Client appears connected, users are unable to access any resources (internet or intranet) after unlocking the device from idle. When we check the log socket connection looks not disrupted, packets are tunnelled but no resource access. Split tunnel enabled and proxy PAC configured. This was observed on both iOS and iPadOS 26 beta.
Steps to reproduce:
Connecting to the internet, launching the Ivanti client, locking the device, and then unlocking it after a brief period of idle. The issue occurs when the VPN remains connected but no resources are accessible.
Networking
RSS for tagExplore the networking protocols and technologies used by the device to connect to Wi-Fi networks, Bluetooth devices, and cellular data services.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Greetings,
I would like to understand this URLCache behavior for two different requests to the same end point but with a different header value. Here is a code with comment explaining the behavior.
// Create a request to for a url.
let url = URL(string: "https://<my url>?f=json")!
var request = URLRequest(url: url)
// Set custom header with a value.
request.setValue("myvalue", forHTTPHeaderField: "CustomField")
// Send request to get the response.
let (data, response) = try await URLSession.shared.data(for: request)
print("data: \(String(describing: String(data: data, encoding: .utf8)))")
print("response: \(response)")
// Create second request to the same url but with different value of custom header field.
var request2 = URLRequest(url: url)
request2.setValue("newvalue", forHTTPHeaderField: "CustomField")
// Check the URL cache for second request and it returns the response
// of the first request even though the second request has different header value.
let cachedResponse = URLCache.shared.cachedResponse(for: request2)
print("cachedResponse: \(cachedResponse?.response)")
Is this a bug in URLCache that request headers are not matched while returning the response?
Is this an expected behavior? If yes, why?
What is the best way to detect if the Wifi is being used for Wireless Carplay or is just a normal network interface?
Hello,
Our users are seeing random crashes in our packet filter system extension on macOS. Any help pointing me in the right direction to either avoid the issue or fix it would be greatly appreciated. Attached is the crash log.
Thank you.
packetfilter.crash
Crashed Thread: 2 Dispatch queue: com.apple.network.connections
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGBUS)
Exception Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at 0x0000000112918700
Exception Note: EXC_CORPSE_NOTIFY
Termination Signal: Bus error: 10
Termination Reason: Namespace SIGNAL, Code 0xa
Terminating Process: exc handler [40687]
...
Thread 2 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.network.connections
0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00007fff2089b46e os_channel_get_next_slot + 230
1 com.apple.NetworkExtension 0x00007fff2e2e2643 __40-[NEFilterPacketInterpose createChannel]_block_invoke + 560
2 libdispatch.dylib 0x00007fff20718806 _dispatch_client_callout + 8
3 libdispatch.dylib 0x00007fff2071b1b0 _dispatch_continuation_pop + 423
4 libdispatch.dylib 0x00007fff2072b564 _dispatch_source_invoke + 2061
5 libdispatch.dylib 0x00007fff20720318 _dispatch_workloop_invoke + 1784
6 libdispatch.dylib 0x00007fff20728c0d _dispatch_workloop_worker_thread + 811
7 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00007fff208bf45d _pthread_wqthread + 314
8 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00007fff208be42f start_wqthread + 15
Hello Everyone,
I am currently using macOS 15.5 and XCode 16.4.
I am using the following code to send/receive multicast packets on multicast group ff02::1 and port 49153 using Apple NF's NWConnectionGroup.
import Network
import Foundation
// Creating a mutlicast group endpoint
let multicastIPv6GroupEndpoint: NWEndpoint = NWEndpoint.hostPort(host: NWEndpoint.Host.ipv6(IPv6Address("ff02::1")!), port: NWEndpoint.Port("49153")!)
do {
let multicastGroupDescriptor: NWMulticastGroup = try NWMulticastGroup (for: [multicastIPv6GroupEndpoint])
let multicastConnectionGroupDescriptor = NWConnectionGroup (with: multicastGroupDescriptor, using: .udp)
multicastConnectionGroupDescriptor.stateUpdateHandler = { state in
print ("🕰️ Connection Group state: \(state)")
if state == .ready {
multicastConnectionGroupDescriptor.send (content: "👋🏻 Hello from the Mac 💻".data (using: .utf8)) { err in
print ("➡️ Now, I am trying to send some messages.")
if let err = err {
print ("💥 Error sending multicast message: \(err)")
} else {
print ("🌚 Initial multicast message sent")
}
}
}
}
multicastConnectionGroupDescriptor.setReceiveHandler { message, content, isComplete in
if let content = content, let messageString = String (data: content, encoding: .utf8) {
print ("⬅️ Received message: \(messageString)")
}
}
multicastConnectionGroupDescriptor.start (queue: .global())
} catch {
print ("💥 Error while creating Multicast Group: \(error)")
}
RunLoop.main.run()
I am able to successfully create a NWConnectionGroup without any warnings/errors.
The issue occurs when the stateUpdateHandler's callback gets invoked.
It first gives me this warning:
nw_listener_socket_inbox_create_socket IPV6_LEAVE_GROUP ff02::1.49153 failed [49: Can't assign requested address
But then it shows me that the state is ready:
🕰️ Connection Group state: ready
After this, when the send is performed, it gives me a bunch of errros:
nw_endpoint_flow_failed_with_error [C1 ff02::1.49153 waiting parent-flow (unsatisfied (Local network prohibited), interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, ipv6, uses wifi)] already failing, returning
nw_socket_connect [C1:1] connectx(7, [srcif=0, srcaddr=::.62838, dstaddr=ff02::1.49153], SAE_ASSOCID_ANY, 0, NULL, 0, NULL, SAE_CONNID_ANY) failed: [48: Address already in use]
nw_socket_connect [C1:1] connectx failed (fd 7) [48: Address already in use]
nw_socket_connect connectx failed [48: Address already in use]
nw_endpoint_flow_failed_with_error [C1 ff02::1.49153 in_progress socket-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, ipv6, dns, uses wifi)] already failing, returning
There is no other background process running on the same port. I tried using different ports as well as multicast groups but the same error persists.
The same code works fine for an IPv4 multicast group.
I have following questions:
Why am I getting these errors specifically for IPv6 multicast group but not for IPv4 multicast group?
Are there any configurations that needed to be done in order to get this working?
Howdy,
I've been developing a packet tunnel extension meant to run on iOS and MacOS. For development I'm using xcodegen + xcodebuild to assemble a bunch of swift and rust code together.
I'm moving from direct TUN device management on Mac to shipping a Network Extension (appex). With that move I noticed that on some mac laptops NE fails to start completely, whilst on others everything works fine.
I'm using CODE_SIGN_STYLE: Automatic, Apple IDs are within the same team, all devices are registered as dev devices. Signing dev certificates, managed by xcode.
Some suspicious logs:
(NetworkExtension) [com.apple.networkextension:] Signature check failed: code failed to satisfy specified code requirement(s)
...
(NetworkExtension) [com.apple.networkextension:] Provider is not signed with a Developer ID certificate
What could be the issue? Where those inconsistencies across devices might come from?
I have a custom VPN app that uses NETunnelProviderManager to install a VPN Profile if one is not already installed. On previous iOS versions this would open the VPN Settings and ask for either the PIN, FaceID or TouchID and install the profile. With iOS 26 beta5 it opens the VPN Settings and stops.
Is this a bug in iOS 26? Have there been changes to NETunnelProviderManager for iOS 26 that I'm not aware of?
FYI we do the samething on macOS 26 beta5 and that works as expected.
I have written an App which extracts data, over WiFi, from an instrument that creates its own WiFi Hotspot.
The instrument provides no internet connection. The iPad version of this App is connects fine and is assigned an IP address by DHCP server running on a MicroChip RN171 wifi module.
iOS assigns an obscure IP address on a completely different subnet. I understand this is iOS' way of "Complaining" that is wasn't assigned an IP address.
Consequently in the case of the iPhone I am forced to manually assign an IP address for the iPhone, the mask and the gateway. Only then is the connection successful.
Anyone know why the iPhone won't talk DHCP to a WiFi module not connected to the internet? Are there perhaps some parameters that I need to adjust on either the iPhone or WiFi module?
My App is a rather small menu-bar status-item app with 2 informational windows. It does NOT make use of ANY of the APIs mentioned here: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/663874 that are bound to need "Local Network" hence trigger TCC dialog.
Yet - on first run of the app, the dialog pops.
App is Obj-C, and the only APIs used are Notification-Center (for scheduling local notifications to the user), XPC connections and calls to other (our) apps for gathering that information, plus normal AppKit windowing (Controls, Text-fields, etc.) nothing else.
Obviously SOMETHING I do causes the thing - and I know for sure this app DOES NOT NEED access to the local network - only I do not know how to identify the specific API I need to avoid using (or change the way I'm using)
Are there any specific system logs to watch for?
Is there any official set of APIs that will trigger the dialog?
Provided that I cannot avoid this - could this permission be granted via MDM profile payload? Our product comes with
Hi! My project has the Local Push Connectivity entitlement for a feature we have requiring us to send low-latency critical notifications over a local, private Wi-Fi network.
We have our NEAppPushProvider creating a SSE connection using the Network framework with our hardware running a server. The server sends a keep-alive message every second. On an iPhone 16 with iOS 18+, the connection is reliable and remains stable for hours, regardless of whether the iOS app is in the foreground, background, or killed.
One of our QA engineers has been testing on an iPhone 13 running iOS 16, and has notice shortly after locking the phone, specifically when not connected to power the device seems to turn off the Wi-Fi radio. So when the server sends a notification, it is not received. About 30s later, it seems to be back on. This happens on regular intervals.
When looking at our log data, the provider does seem to be getting stopped, then restarted shortly after. The reason code is NEProviderStopReasonNoNetworkAvailable, which further validates that the network is getting dropped by the device in regular intervals.
My questions are:
Were there possibly silent changes to the framework between iOS versions that could be the reason we're seeing inconsistent behavior?
Is there a connection type we could use, instead of SSE, that would prevent the device from disconnecting and reconnecting to the Wi-Fi network?
Is there an alternative approach to allow us to maintain a persistent network connection with the extension or app?
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Networking
Tags:
Extensions
Network
User Notifications
Network Extension
There are multiple report of crashes on URLConnectionLoader::loadWithWhatToDo. The crashed thread in the stack traces pointing to calls inside CFNetwork which seems to be internal library in iOS.
The crash has happened quite a while already (but we cannot detect when the crash started to occur) and impacted multiple iOS versions recorded from iOS 15.4 to 18.4.1 that was recorded in Xcode crash report organizer so far.
Unfortunately, we have no idea on how to reproduce it yet but the crash keeps on increasing and affect more on iOS 18 users (which makes sense because many people updated their iOS to the newer version) and we haven’t found any clue on what actually happened and how to fix it on the crash reports. What we understand is it seems to come from a network request that happened to trigger the crash but we need more information on what (condition) actually cause it and how to solve it.
Hereby, I attach sample crash report for both iOS 15 and 18.
I also have submitted a report (that include more crash reports) with number: FB17775979.
Will appreciate any insight regarding this issue and any resolution that we can do to avoid it.
iOS 15.crash
iOS 18.crash
I upgraded my Mac to Sequoia 15.4.1 an i hat to upgrade XCode to Version 16.3.
I access a MQTT Broker by an sending an
mosquitto_sub
request to the Broker.
Now its no longer possible the request fails
i granted Network permission to my App
With the new macOS 15, Apple introduced the new Local Network Privacy feature.
This is causing issues for our customers as - even though they granted the required permission for our software - connections to a server in their local network are being blocked. The situation is not fixed by recent macOS updates.
As far as I know, this issue exists for machines running on Apple Silicon. Systems running macOS versions (e.g. Sonoma) are not affected.
Currently, the workaround is to re-enable the permission under Settings > Privacy & Security > Local Network. The list shows our application with an enabled checkbox. Users now have to de-select the box and then re-select it again for the application to work. They have to do this after each and every reboot of their system, which is slightly annoying (so at the moment we recommend to not upgrade macOS to Sequoia, if possible)
I did some research and saw that other products are also affected by this bug. Is there a solution to this issue or any plans to fix it?
Hi,
My app uses the NetworkExtension framework to connect to an access point.
For some reason, my app occasionally fails to find and/or connect to my AP (which I know is online and beaconing on a given frequency). This roughly happens 1/10 times.
I am using an iPhone 17, running iOS 26.0.1. I am connecting to a WPA2-Personal network.
In the iPhone system logs, I see the following:
Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: Dequeuing command type: "Scan" pending commands: 0
Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceCopyPreparedScanResults: network records count: 0
Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: WiFi infra associated, NAN DISABLED, , DFS state Off, IR INACTIVE, llwLink ACTIVE, RTM-DP 0, allowing scans
Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: isScanDisallowedByAwdl[1148] : InfraScanAllowed 1 (RTModeScan 0 NonSteering 0 assistDisc 0 HTMode 0 RTModeNeeded 0 Immin 0 ScanType 1 Flags 0 ScanOn2GOnly 0 DevAllows2G 1)
Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: IO80211PeerManager::setScanningState:5756:_scanningState:0x2(oldState 0) on:1, source:ScanManagerFamily, err:0
Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: setScanningState:: Scan request from ScanManagerFamily. Time since last scan(1.732 s) Number of channels(0), 2.4 only(no), isDFSScan 0, airplaying 0, scanningState 0x2
Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: IO80211PeerManager::setScanningState:5756:_scanningState:0x2(oldState 0) on:1, source:ScanManagerFamily, err:0
Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: Controller Scan Started, scan state 0 -> 2
Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: IO80211PeerManager::setScanningState:5756:_scanningState:0x0(oldState 2) on:0, source:ScanError, err:3766617154
Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: setScanningState[23946]:: Scan complete for source(8)ScanError. Time(0.000 s), airplaying 0, scanningState 0x0 oldState 0x2 rtModeActive 0 (ProxSetup 0 curSchedState 3)
Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: IO80211PeerManager::setScanningState:5756:_scanningState:0x0(oldState 2) on:0, source:ScanError, err:3766617154
Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: Controller Scan Done, scan state 2 -> 0
Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(IO80211)[54] <Notice>: Apple80211IOCTLSetWrapper:6536 @[35563.366221] ifname['en0'] IOUC type 10/'APPLE80211_IOC_SCAN_REQ', len[5528] return -528350142/0xe0820442
Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid[54] <Notice>: [WiFiPolicy] {SCAN-} Completed Apple80211ScanAsync on en0 (0xe0820442) with 0 networks
Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: __WiFiDeviceCreateFilteredScanResults: null scanResults
Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceCreateFilteredScanResults: rssiThresh 0, doTrimming 0, scanResultsCount: 0, trimmedScanResultsCount: 0, filteredScanResultsCount: 0, nullNetworksCount: 0
Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceManagerDispatchUserForcedAssociationCallback: result 1
Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: __WiFiDeviceManagerForcedAssociationCallback: failed to association error 1
Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: WiFiLocalizationGetLocalizedString: lang='en_GB' key='WIFI_JOIN_NETWORK_FAILURE_TITLE' value='Unable to join the network
\M-b\M^@\M^\%@\M-b\M^@\M^]'
Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: WiFiLocalizationGetLocalizedString: lang='en_GB' key='WIFI_FAILURE_OK' value='OK'
Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceManagerUserForcedAssociationScanCallback: scan results were empty
It looks like there is a scan error, and I see the error: failed to association error 1.
I have also seen the iOS device find the SSID but fail to associate (associated error 2):
Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiMetricsManagerCopyLinkChangeNetworkParams: updating AccessPointInfo: {
DeviceNameElement = testssid;
ManufacturerElement = " ";
ModelName = " ";
ModelNumber = " ";
}
Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiMetricsManagerCopyLinkChangeNetworkParams: minSupportDataRate 6, maxSupportDataRate 54
Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: Disassociated.
Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: __WiFiMetricsManagerUpdateDBAndSubmitAssociationFailure: Failed to append deauthSourceOUI to CA event
Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: __WiFiMetricsManagerUpdateDBAndSubmitAssociationFailure: Failed to append bssidOUI to CA event
..... <log omitted>
..... <log omitted>
Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(CoreWiFi)[54] <Notice>: [corewifi] END REQ [GET SSID] took 0.005530542s (pid=260 proc=mediaplaybackd bundleID=com.apple.mediaplaybackd codesignID=com.apple.mediaplaybackd service=com.apple.private.corewifi-xpc qos=21 intf=(null) uuid=D67EF err=-528342013 reply=(null)
Oct 8 12:25:52 SpringBoard(SpringBoard)[244] <Notice>: Presenting a CFUserNotification with reply port: 259427 on behalf of: wifid.54
Oct 8 12:25:52 SpringBoard(SpringBoard)[244] <Notice>: Received request to activate alertItem: <SBUserNotificationAlert: 0xc20a49b80; title: Unable to join the network
\M-b\M^@\M^\\134^Htestssid\134^?\M-b\M^@\M^]; source: wifid; pid: 54>
Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceManagerUserForcedAssociationCallback: failed forced association
Oct 8 12:25:52 SpringBoard(SpringBoard)[244] <Notice>: Activation - Presenting <SBUserNotificationAlert: 0xc20a49b80; title: Unable to join the network
\M-b\M^@\M^\\134^Htestssid\134^?\M-b\M^@\M^]; source: wifid; pid: 54> with presenter: <SBUnlockedAlertItemPresenter: 0xc1d9f6530>
Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceManagerDispatchUserForcedAssociationCallback: result 2
Oct 8 12:25:52 SpringBoard(SpringBoard)[244] <Notice>: Activation - Presenter:<SBUnlockedAlertItemPresenter: 0xc1d9f6530> will present presentation: <SBAlertItemPresentation: 0xc1cd40820; alertItem: <SBUserNotificationAlert: 0xc20a49b80; presented: NO>; presenter: <SBUnlockedAlertItemPresenter: 0xc1d9f6530>>
Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: __WiFiDeviceManagerForcedAssociationCallback: failed to association error 2
Anyone able to help with this?
Our application has initiated an NSURLSession data task, and we have received an initiation ID. However, Application not received callback on the subsequent activity: the task has not been requested, has not timed out, and no error callback has been received.
[06/17 09:29:40:559][ 0x282a7d8c0] Requested TaskIdentifier 120
2025-06-17 09:29:40.623337 +0530 nsurlsessiond SUBMITTING: com.apple.CFNetwork-cc-166-373-Task .<120>:A71666 default
2025-06-17 09:29:40.631280 +0530 dasd Submitted Activity: com.apple.CFNetwork-cc-166-373-Task .<120>:A71666 at priority 10 default
Seen couple of rejection with for CPUUsagePolicy and MemoryPressurePolicy
2025-06-17 09:29:40.989360 +0530 dasd com.apple.CFNetwork-cc-166-373-Task .<120>:A71666:[
{name: CPUUsagePolicy, policyWeight: 5.000, response: {Decision: Must Not Proceed, Score: 0.00, Rationale: [{[Max allowed CPU Usage level]: Required:90.00, Observed:95.00},]}}
{name: MemoryPressurePolicy, policyWeight: 5.000, response: {Decision: Must Not Proceed, Score: 0.00, Rationale: [{[memoryPressure]: Required:1.00, Observed:2.00},]}}
], FinalDecision: Must Not Proceed} default
2025-06-17 10:55:22.500277 +0530 dasd com.apple.CFNetwork-cc-166-373-Task .<120>:A71666:[
{name: MemoryPressurePolicy, policyWeight: 5.000, response: {Decision: Must Not Proceed, Score: 0.00, Rationale: [{[memoryPressure]: Required:1.00, Observed:2.00},]}}
], FinalDecision: Must Not Proceed} default
And more an hour later then it throws with an error BUT NEVER indicated the same to client
2025-06-17 10:55:27.426549 +0530 WAVE PTX Task .<120> is for <>.<>.<120> default
2025-06-17 10:55:27.776951 +0530 nsurlsessiond Task .<120> summary for task failure {transaction_duration_ms=5147145, response_status=-1, connection=0, reused=1, request_start_ms=0, request_duration_ms=0, response_start_ms=0, response_duration_ms=0, request_bytes=0, response_bytes=0, cache_hit=false} default
2025-06-17 10:55:27.777096 +0530 nsurlsessiond NDSession <714296D7-20F9-4A0A-8C31-71FB67F39A56> Task .<120> for client will be retried after error Error Domain=_nsurlsessiondErrorDomain Code=6 UserInfo={NSErrorFailingURLStringKey=, NSErrorFailingURLKey=, _NSURLErrorRelatedURLSessionTaskErrorKey=, _NSURLErrorFailingURLSessionTaskErrorKey=} - code: 6 default
Then It got resumed and says successful but never got any callback on the same to client
2025-06-17 10:55:28.877245 +0530 nsurlsessiond NDSession <714296D7-20F9-4A0A-8C31-71FB67F39A56> Task .<120> resuming default
2025-06-17 10:55:55.225456 +0530 nsurlsessiond Task .<120> received response, status 401 content K default
2025-06-17 10:55:55.250371 +0530 nsurlsessiond Task .<120> finished successfully default
Please refer feedback for diagnose logs:
https://feedbackassistant.apple.com/feedback/18173303
My laptop (M1 Pro, macOS 15.3.2) is connected to a dual stack network via Wi-Fi. The home.arpa. domain is supplied as a search domain via both DHCPv4 (options 15 and 119) and DHCPv6 (option 24). "Details…" for the network connection in System Settings show this domain under the DNS tab.
The laptop uses a Forwarding DNS Resolver of my router, which in turn forwards requests for home.arpa. (including subdomains) to a local DNS server (CoreDNS) which is authoritative for this zone.
The DNS server is configured via the following zone file:
$ORIGIN home.arpa.
$TTL 3600
@ IN SOA @ nobody.invalid. (1 3600 1200 604800 3600)
@ NS @
@ AAAA ….1
gateway A ….1
gateway AAAA …::1
b._dns-sd._udp PTR @
lb._dns-sd._udp PTR @
db._dns-sd._udp PTR @
_services._dns-sd._udp PTR _smb._tcp
_smb._tcp PTR Media._smb._tcp
Media._smb._tcp SRV 0 0 445 gateway
Media._smb._tcp TXT ("path=/media" "u=guest")
Output of dig(1) looks like:
$ dig @….1 -t PTR lb._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa.
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 43291
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;lb._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa. IN PTR
;; ANSWER SECTION:
lb._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa. 1993 IN PTR home.arpa.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
home.arpa. 2771 IN NS home.arpa.
$ dig @….1 -t PTR _services._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa.
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 9057
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;_services._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa. IN PTR
;; ANSWER SECTION:
_services._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa. 3600 IN PTR _smb._tcp.home.arpa.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
home.arpa. 3600 IN NS home.arpa.
$ dig @….1 -t PTR _smb._tcp.home.arpa.
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 44220
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;_smb._tcp.home.arpa. IN PTR
;; ANSWER SECTION:
_smb._tcp.home.arpa. 3599 IN PTR Media._smb._tcp.home.arpa.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
home.arpa. 3599 IN NS home.arpa.
$ dig @….1 -t SRV Media._smb._tcp.home.arpa.
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 45878
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;Media._smb._tcp.home.arpa. IN SRV
;; ANSWER SECTION:
media._smb._tcp.home.arpa. 3600 IN SRV 0 0 445 gateway.home.arpa.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
home.arpa. 3600 IN NS home.arpa.
$ dig @….1 -t A gateway.home.arpa.
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 2782
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;gateway.home.arpa. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
gateway.home.arpa. 86400 IN A 192.168.99.1
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
home.arpa. 3578 IN NS home.arpa.
$ dig @….1 -t AAAA gateway.home.arpa.
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 17297
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;gateway.home.arpa. IN AAAA
;; ANSWER SECTION:
gateway.home.arpa. 3600 IN AAAA fd6f:9784:5753::1
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
home.arpa. 3600 IN NS home.arpa.
Output of dns-sd(1):
/usr/bin/dns-sd -test
…
Testing for error returns when various strings are > 63 bytes: PASSED
Running basic API input range tests with various pointer parameters set to NULL:
Basic API input range tests: PASSED
$ dns-sd -m -F
Looking for recommended browsing domains:
DATE: ---Fri 11 Apr 2025---
8:50:17.846 ...STARTING...
Timestamp Recommended Browsing domain
8:50:17.847 Added (More) local
8:50:17.847 Added arpa
- > home
$ dns-sd -B _smb._tcp home.arpa.
Browsing for _smb._tcp.home.arpa.
DATE: ---Fri 11 Apr 2025---
8:59:10.044 ...STARTING...
$ dns-sd -L Media _smb._tcp home.arpa.
Lookup Media._smb._tcp.home.arpa.
DATE: ---Fri 11 Apr 2025---
9:15:53.328 ...STARTING...
$ dns-sd -Q _smb._tcp.home.arpa. PTR IN
DATE: ---Fri 11 Apr 2025---
9:16:52.208 ...STARTING...
Timestamp A/R Flags IF Name Type Class Rdata
9:16:52.210 Add 40000002 0 _smb._tcp.home.arpa. PTR IN 0.0.0.0 No Such Record
9:16:52.222 Add 2 0 _smb._tcp.home.arpa. PTR IN 0.0.0.0 No Such Record
Similarly, when I open Finder->Network I see home.arpa but it's empty. Of interest is that on the DNS server side I see the following requests being made:
2025-04-11 09:03:15 container,info,debug [INFO] […]:56541 - 21555 "SOA IN _afpovertcp._tcp.home.arpa. udp 44 false 512" NXDOMAIN qr,aa,rd 112 0.000755089s
2025-04-11 09:03:15 container,info,debug [INFO] […]:56077 - 58266 "SOA IN _smb._tcp.home.arpa. udp 37 false 512" NOERROR qr,aa,rd 105 0.001012632s
2025-04-11 09:03:15 container,info,debug [INFO] […]:45274 - 45976 "SOA IN _rfb._tcp.home.arpa. udp 37 false 512" NXDOMAIN qr,aa,rd 105 0.000762339s
2025-04-11 09:03:15 container,info,debug [INFO] […]:54387 - 32090 "SOA IN _adisk._tcp.home.arpa. udp 39 false 512" NXDOMAIN qr,aa,rd 107 0.001058132s
2025-04-11 09:03:15 container,info,debug [INFO] […]:35855 - 51155 "SOA IN _tcp.home.arpa. udp 32 false 512" NOERROR qr,aa,rd 100 0.000664963s
I suppose that an attempt to locate services is made but it's unsuccessful and I'm not sure why.
What further debugging can I attempt?
We have an old iOS app and an old camera that connects using Wi-Fi either using an access point or Ad Hoc network, e.g., iPhone/iPad connects to the camera's Wi-Fi directly...
How it works (old legacy app/system, which cannot be redesigned):
Camera is configured to Ad Hoc Wi-Fi network (insecure TCP).
iPhone connects to this insecure Wi-Fi.
Camera uses Bonjour service to broadcast its IP address.
App reads in IP address and begin to send messages to the camera using NSMutableURLRequest, etc.
All this works fine for iOS 17. But in iOS 18 step 4 stopped working. App simply doesn't get any responses!
We believe we have configured ATS properly (App Store version):
In panic we have also tried this in Test Flight version:
The latter actually seemed to make a difference when running the app on macOS Apple Silicon. But on iOS it didn't seem to make any difference.
Occasionally, I was lucky to get connection on on iPhone 16 Pro with iOS 18. But for the 'many' iPads I have tried I couldn't.
I also tried to install CFNetwork profile and look at the logs but I believe I just got timeout on the requests.
Questions:
Why it iOS 18 different? Bonjour works fine, but NSSURLRequests doesn't
Do we configure ATS correctly for this scenario?
What should I look for in the Console log when CFNetwork profile is installed?
Should I file a TSI?
Thanks! :)
There is no available API that allows you to connect to Android. The current APIs that are provided are not compatible outside of the Apple Ecosystem. For example, Android requires you to set a service name and a password where iOS sets a service and a PIN authentication strategy in a specific format that’s not compatible. It looks like the implementation is not following the Wifi Aware Specifications.
To enable cross platform interoperability while providing security, could you adopt the same strategy as with Bluetooth and enable iOS users to enable the sharing and subscription of services with Everyone.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Networking
Our product (rockhawk.ca) uses the Multipeer Connectivity framework for peer-to-peer communication between multiple iOS/iPadOS devices. My understanding is that MC framework communicates via three methods: 1) infrastructure wifi (i.e. multiple iOS/iPadOS devices are connected to the same wifi network), 2) peer-to-peer wifi, or 3) Bluetooth. In my experience, I don't believe I've seen MC use Bluetooth. With wifi turned off on the devices, and Bluetooth turned on, no connection is established. With wifi on and Bluetooth off, MC works and I presume either infrastructure wifi (if available) or peer-to-peer wifi are used.
I'm trying to overcome two issues:
Over time (since iOS 9.x), the radio transmit strength for MC over peer-to-peer wifi has decreased to the point that range is unacceptable for our use case. We need at least 150 feet range.
We would like to extend this support to watchOS and the MC framework is not available.
Regarding #1, I'd like to confirm that if infrastructure wifi is available, MC uses it. If infrastructure wifi is not available, MC uses peer-to-peer wifi. If this is true, then we can assure our customers that if infrastructure wifi is available at the venue, then with all devices connected to it, range will be adequate.
If infrastructure wifi is not available at the venue, perhaps a mobile wifi router (battery operated) could be set up, devices connected to it, then range would be adequate. We are about to test this. Reasonable?
Can we be assured that if infrastructure wifi is available, MC uses it?
Regarding #2, given we are targeting minimum watchOS 7.0, would the available networking APIs and frameworks be adequate to implement our own equivalent of the MC framework so our app on iOS/iPadOS and watchOS devices could communicate? How much work? Where would I start? I'm new to implementing networking but experienced in using the MC framework. I'm assuming that I would write the networking code to use infrastructure wifi to achieve acceptable range.
Many thanks!
Tim
For years our iOS apps have experienced a networking problem, which blocks them connecting to our servers via their API endpoint domains.
How can we recover after the scenario described below?
Using 3rd party error logging solutions, which have different endpoint domains, we can record the error:
NSUnderlyingError": Error Domain=kCFErrorDomainCFNetwork Code=-1200 "(null)" UserInfo={_kCFStreamPropertySSLClientCertificateState=0, _kCFNetworkCFStreamSSLErrorOriginalValue=-9816, _kCFStreamErrorDomainKey=3, _kCFStreamErrorCodeKey=-9816, _NSURLErrorNWPathKey=satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: pdp_ip0[lte], ipv4, dns, expensive, uses cell}, "_NSURLErrorFailingURLSessionTaskErrorKey": LocalDataTask <DEDBFA4D-810D-4438-A6A0-95E3B9668B9E>.<308>, "_kCFStreamErrorDomainKey": 3, "_NSURLErrorRelatedURLSessionTaskErrorKey": <__NSSingleObjectArrayI 0x301f82e60>(
LocalDataTask <DEDBFA4D-810D-4438-A6A0-95E3B9668B9E>.<308>
)
"NSLocalizedDescription": An SSL error has occurred and a secure connection to the server cannot be made., "NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion": Would you like to connect to the server anyway?
-9816 is the "server closed session with no notification" error based on comments in CoreFoundation source files. Subsequent API endpoint calls to the same domain return the same error.
The SSL error occurs most prevalently after a server outage. However, despite our best efforts, we have been unable to replicate triggering the problem for development purposes via experiments with our server.
When the error occurs the users report that:
Fully closing (i.e. not just sending to background) and reopening the app does NOT clear connectivity to our server being blocked.
Problem seems more prevalent when using mobile/cell data.
Switching from mobile/cell data to WIFI resolves the connection problem and then switching back to mobile/cell data shows the problem again. So the underlying problem is not cleared.
All other apps on the same device and mobile/cell data or WIFI connection, like Safari, have no problems connecting to the Internet.
Deleting and reinstalling, or updating (when an update is available) resolves the problem.
Or after waiting a few days the problem seems to resolve itself.
The last two point above suggest that something is persisted/cached in the app preventing it from connecting properly with subsequent network attempts.
Notes:
We have one shared instance of the URLSession in the app for its networking because we are aware of the perils of multiple URLSession instances.
We recently added conditions to call the URLSession await reset() method when detecting the SLL errors before repeating the request. It is debatable whether this reduces the problem as we still see logged cases with the subsequent requests hitting the same -9816 error.
URLSession configuration:
let config = URLSessionConfiguration.default
config.timeoutIntervalForResource = 22
config.timeoutIntervalForRequest = 20
config.requestCachePolicy = .reloadIgnoringLocalCacheData
config.urlCache = nil