Hey everyone,
I have an app using the screen time api, I've had quite a few reports from users saying that our monitoring features stop working until they open our app. What happens is that activities and schedules set with the device activity monitor seem to disappear. This is something we check on app re-opens and so we schedule them again and that is why the monitoring starts working again.
Of course our current solution is not optimal since our app is mainly passive. Has anyone experienced these kinds of issue ?
General
RSS for tagDelve into the world of built-in app and system services available to developers. Discuss leveraging these services to enhance your app's functionality and user experience.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
I have an App Intent that returns a MyEntity value with the following properties:
struct MyEntity: AppEntity {
@Property(title: "Title")
var title: String?
@Property(title: "Image")
var image: IntentFile?
}
I created a Shortcut that takes the output value of this intent and passes it as the input to the Send Message action. When I tap the MyEntity parameter in the message action, it shows to be of Type MyEntity. Below that, I can select 1 of 3 options: MyEntity, Title, or Image.
When I run the shortcut, a new message compose window appears with the following behavior depending on the selected option:
MyEntity - the message draft is empty
Title - the message draft shows the title string
Image - the message draft shows the image
My expected and desired result when MyEntity is selected would be a message draft populated with the image and the title string as text. How would I achieve this? Is it possible?
I've experimented with conforming MyEntity to Transferable. That's enabled use cases such as passing the MyEntity input as Type Image for example.
Do I need to create a custom UTType to represent MyEntity, or is that unrelated to my issue? I haven't explored this yet but seems potentially related!
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
Shortcuts
Uniform Type Identifiers
App Intents
Core Transferable
I have published the app on the App Store along with its corresponding app clip, my app clip is configured with some advanced experiences for each one of my clients, but whenever some users try to scan an NFC or QR Code they see the card rendering correctly with their configured banner image, but with the message "App Clip Unavailable".
The weird thing is that both iMessage and the website to which the associated domain is set and the apple-app-site-association is stored, renders the banner or card correctly, and when the users tap the banner or card they open the advanced app clip experience correctly without any issue.
I have attempted to troubleshoot the issue by checking the following:
if the app clip is below 15MB
if we are using a second level domain in my associated domain both for my app clip and app (excluding the www subdomain).
checking if the AASA is correctly stored inside .well-known directory
checking the configuration for the advanced experience
I opened a case: 102233443873, and added a bunch of videos and screenshot showcasing the issue, but I have not yet received a reply
Hi,
I'm trying to add an extension to my app on iOS 26.
I've followed the instructions on https://developer.apple.com/documentation/extensionfoundation/adding-support-for-app-extensions-to-your-app
and made it as far as being able to launch the extension:
let monitor = try await AppExtensionPoint.Monitor(appExtensionPoint: .localWebServerExtension)
currentIdentity = monitor.identities.first
if let currentIdentity = currentIdentity {
let myConfig = AppExtensionProcess.Configuration(appExtensionIdentity: currentIdentity, onInterruption: { NSLog("extension was terminated") })
myProcess = try await AppExtensionProcess(configuration: myConfig)
myConnection = try myProcess?.makeXPCConnection()
}
None of these calls throw, and when I examine myProcess from inside that code, it seems to be normal (there's a pid, for example).
Yet the code inside my extension seems to not be executed: breakpoints are not triggered, NSLog() calls do not appear on the console. The onInterruption() callback is also not triggered, or at least it does not appear on the console either.
I've probably missed something obvious, but what could it be?
Hello,
In production, a large number of users experience outgoing call reporting fails with the following error:
com.apple.CallKit.error.requesttransaction Code=2
The iOS version doesn't matter, errors are present in v15-26
Details
My CXProvider held as a global singleton, so it’s unlikely to be deinited.
There is no explicit call to CXProvider.invalidate() in the app.
If I manually invalidate the CXProvider, I observe the expected failure when trying to create an outgoing call (com.apple.CallKit.error.requesttransaction error 2).
However, If I recreate the CXProvider after the error, outgoing calls are reported correctly.
Many users trigger the providerDidReset delegate method (CXProviderDelegate) before this error.
According to the documentation, providerDidReset can be called by the system, and we are supposed to end all active calls, but the documentation doesn't suggest recreating the CXProvider.
Question
Should I recreate CXProvider after providerDidReset and forget about that, or could this error be caused by something else?
Since legacyScreenSaver is still the thing running screensavers we make, and it's still buggy, why won't they give us a new template for building screensavers that run in the new engine? And hopefully they don't require them to blend in with the desktop, because most of us don't want that. A wallpaper is a wallpaper, and a screensaver is a screensaver.
Hello,
I have an app that emulates an NFC card using NFC HCE.
Since yesterday I saw an increasing number of crashes on iOS 26 only, which wasn't there before.
From what I can see, it seems the app crashes when the NFC presentment intent is shown and 60 seconds passed and user does nothing. The app just crashes after 60 seconds.
On previous iOS versions, I know that CardSession.Error.maxSessionDurationReached was thrown after 60 seconds.
Is something changed in iOS 26?
I'm currently experimenting with the latest Xcode beta 15.3 (15E5194e) and attempting to integrate FinanceKit](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/financekit) into my project. However, I've encountered a persistent issue where the app crashes upon attempting to read or request authorization, accompanied by the following error message:
FinanceKit/FinanceStore+FinancialDataAuthorization.swift:52: Fatal error: Process is not entitled
Upon investigation, I've found no evident entitlements for FinanceKit, despite exploring options like Apple Wallet. Furthermore, I thoroughly examined the info.plist for relevant privacy values but found nothing pertinent.
Here's the code snippet that triggers the fatal error, whether it's the request or read function:
I don't see anything in entitlements for FinanceKit (I tried Apple Wallet and that didn't make a difference). Additionally, I checked for relevant privacy values for the info.plist but again didn't see anything relevant.
Here is the code to reproduce the error (note calling either function will result in the same fatal error):
import FinanceKit
import UIKit
class ViewController: UIViewController {
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
requestFinancePermission()
// readFinancePermission()
}
private func requestFinancePermission() {
Task {
do {
let status = try await FinanceStore.shared.requestAuthorization()
} catch {
print("Error: \(error)")
}
}
}
private func readFinancePermission() {
Task {
do {
let status = try await FinanceStore.shared.authorizationStatus()
} catch {
print("Error: \(error)")
}
}
}
}
I'm seeking clarification on whether FinanceKit is currently usable or if there are additional steps needed for proper integration. Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
What I want to achieve now is that when the app is not running, upon receiving a notification, it displays an interface similar to CallKit with accept and decline buttons.
Here is part of my code:
@available(iOS 17.4, *)
class LiveCommunicationManager: NSObject, ConversationManagerDelegate {
static let shared = LiveCommunicationManager()
var isInvalidate:Bool = false
var configuration: ConversationManager!
override init() {
let config = ConversationManager.Configuration(
ringtoneName: "notes_of_the_optimistic",
iconTemplateImageData: UIImage(named: "AppIcon")?.pngData(), // 图标的 PNG 数据
maximumConversationGroups: 1, // 最大对话组数
maximumConversationsPerConversationGroup: 1, // 每个对话组内最大对话数
includesConversationInRecents: false, // 是否在通话记录中显示
supportsVideo: false, // 是否支持视频
supportedHandleTypes: [.generic,.phoneNumber,.emailAddress] // 支持的通话类型
)
configuration = ConversationManager.init(configuration: config)
}
func reportIncomingCall(uuid: UUID, callerName: String) {
configuration.delegate = self
let local = Handle(type: .generic, value: callerName, displayName: callerName)
let update = Conversation.Update(localMember: local,members: [local],activeRemoteMembers: [local])
Task{
do {
try await configuration.reportNewIncomingConversation(uuid: uuid, update: update)
print("成功报告新来电")
} catch {
print("报告新来电失败: \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
}
}
func conversationManager(_ manager: ConversationManager, conversationChanged conversation: Conversation) {
print("会话状态改变了")
}
func conversationManagerDidBegin(_ manager: ConversationManager) {
print("会话已经开始了")
manager.delegate = self
}
func conversationManagerDidReset(_ manager: ConversationManager) {
print("会话将要清除了")
}
func conversationManager(_ manager: ConversationManager, perform action: ConversationAction) {
print("会话接听了")
configuration.invalidate()
}
func conversationManager(_ manager: ConversationManager, timedOutPerforming action: ConversationAction) {
print("会话超时了")
}
func conversationManager(_ manager: ConversationManager, didActivate audioSession: AVAudioSession) {
print("会话激活了")
}
func conversationManager(_ manager: ConversationManager, didDeactivate audioSession: AVAudioSession) {
print("会话死亡了")
}
}
在Appdelegate里设置了这些:
func application(_ application: UIApplication,
didReceiveRemoteNotification userInfo: [AnyHashable: Any],
fetchCompletionHandler completionHandler: @escaping (UIBackgroundFetchResult) -> Void) {
// 在这里处理离线推送通知
completionHandler(.noData) // 返回后台任务完成
if let aps = userInfo["aps"] as? [String: Any],
let alert = aps["alert"] as? [String : Any]{
// 静默推送的处理逻辑
if #available(iOS 17.4, *) {
let manager = LiveCommunicationManager.shared
if manager.isInvalidate { return }
if let msgType = userInfo["msgType"] as? Int{
if msgType == 5{
manager.configuration.invalidate()
}else{
let callerName = alert["title"] as? String ?? "Fanvil"
manager.reportIncomingCall(uuid: UUID(), callerName: callerName)
}
}
}
}
}
Xcode has been configured with the necessary capabilities, such as Background Fetch, Voice over IP, Background Processing, and Push Notification.
The issue now is that sometimes the code works as expected, allowing the app to wake up when not running and displaying the system interface with accept and decline buttons. However, after a few successful attempts, the app stops waking up, and no notification appears. But when I manually open the app, the didReceiveRemoteNotification method gets triggered.
I’d like to know why this stops working after a few times.
Issue with App Clip Card Showing "App Clip unavailable" for DIGI LIVE App
In my DIGI LIVE application, I have an App Clip configured for iOS 17.6+ (the file exceeds the 15 MB limit), and I have made all the necessary preparations for the App Clip to work correctly. However, the App Clip card constantly displays an "App Clip unavailable" error for various users (depending on their system language).
The URL associated with the App Clip invocation is: https://ar.digi-live.de
The AASA file is located at /.well-known/apple-app-site-association and contains the required fields for the App Clip:
{
"applinks": {
"details": [
{
"appIDs": ["N9QR6LF765.de.digilive.app"],
"components":[
{
"#": "no_universal_links",
"exclude": true,
"comment": "Matches any URL whose fragment equals no_universal_links and instructs the system not to open it as a universal link"
},
{
"/": "*",
"comment": "Matches any URL like ar.digi-live.de"
}
]
}
]
},
"appclips": {
"apps": ["N9QR6LF765.de.digilive.app.Clip"]
}
}
If I use the default App Clip link (https://appclip.apple.com/id?p=de.digilive.app.Clip) to launch it, the "App Clip unavailable" error no longer appears. But if I delete the App Clip from the settings, the error comes back, and it can only be launched again using the default link.
It feels like the problem is with the App Clip loading at the moment the App Clip card is triggered — it simply fails to load.
Video
https://storage.yandexcloud.net/mmrs/files/digilive/IMG_2259.mp4
My app is a VoIP softphone for Mac that allows people to make phone calls to a regular phone numbers. The app exists since before Mac App Store. The app declares itself to the system as capable of handling tel: URLs. Until now, people could change the default handler for tel URLs in FaceTime settings (Default for calls).
In macOS Tahoe 26, this doesn't seem to be possible any more. That option is gone from the FaceTime settings.
Is it completely gone or has it been moved somewhere else? If there is no UI control for this any more, is it possible to change it programmatically?
we have three problem when using the push notification on Live Activity.
1. What is the specific callback strategy for the activityUpdates property in ActivityKit?
We found that in actual user scenarios, there is a probability that we may not receive callbacks. From the community experience, there are some resource optimization strategies that do not perform callbacks. From this perspective, the explanation is kind of vague. Is there any clear feedback to understand why callbacks are performed/not performed?
2.what is the specific description of the wake-up strategy, when background app receive Live Activity offline start Push?
From community experience, we can see that the system may wake up for a duration of 0-30s due to resource optimization strategies, or not wake up/not deal with it. Is there an official description of the wake-up strategy? or we also have to follow this description:
Wake up of apps using content-available pushes are heavily throttled. You can expect 1-2 wakeup per hour as a best case scenario in the hands of your users. so this cannot be assumed to be a reliable wake-up on demand mechanism for an app.
3 How can we determine user have selected (allow or always allow) of the Live Activity permission?
When we use real-time activity offline push, there are two system prompts in iOS:
the first prompt : allow and disallow real-time activity
the second prompt : always allow and disallow
Is there an interface that can directly determine which permission the user has chosen (allow/always allow)? (By the way, we can get disallow status).
At present, we haven't seen any interface in the official documentation/interface that can determine (allow/always allow). The difference here will affect the generation of Update Token. Without Update Token, we can not update our activity instance.
I have four apps currently deployed on the App Store. One of these apps crashes on launch when running on iOS 26, but functions as expected on iOS 18 and earlier versions. I am seeking to understand what changes in iOS 26 might be causing this issue.
When running the app in debug mode on devices with iOS 26 using Xcode 16.1, the app crashes.
The crash log references libobjc-trampolines.dylib, suggesting a potential issue with the Objective-C runtime.
Has anyone else encountered a similar issue?
AGX: AGX: agxa_device_template.hpp:1467:setupCompiler: *** FATAL: driver shader binary file not found in (null) for extension g15p!!!
D [yHZ]: added warning: [MEDIUM]: SW04: A debugger is attached to the App.
D [ProbeCallbacks]: [IXGUARD] debugger detected
objc[1461]: couldn't dlopen libobjc-trampolines.dylib: dlopen(/usr/lib/libobjc-trampolines.dylib, 0x0106): tried: '/usr/lib/system/introspection/libobjc-trampolines.dylib' (no such file, not in dyld cache), '/usr/lib/libobjc-trampolines.dylib' (no such file), '/private/preboot/Cryptexes/OS/usr/lib/libobjc-trampolines.dylib' (open() failed with errno=24), '/usr/lib/libobjc-trampolines.dylib' (no such file, not in dyld cache)
What steps can I take to resolve this crash?
Thank you for your assistance.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
General
Hi All,
I am facing one problem in my app.
That is open battery settings from my app.
It is working fine in iOS 16.0.0 and it's not working in iOS 18.6.1
is it possible to make it workable in iOS 18.6.1?
If so How to do that?
Please help me over this to resolve the problem.
Thanks,
Nguyen Quang Minh
We are planning on renaming our app. The new name is not like the current name. It will be renamed in the App Store as well as the App display name. Yet, we still want new and existing users to be able to find the app by using the old name in search/spotlight under iOS. A great example of this is entering Twitter to find the X app and it shows up in the App section in the Spotlight search.
Are there any guidelines, settings, or tricks for doing this? Some have suggested adding a Spotlight search term but that will not have it show up in the App section I fear.
Hi,
I am just wondering if there is any option to protect my endpoints that will be used by Message Filtering Extension?
According to the documentation our API has 2 endpoints:
/.well-known/apple-app-site-association
/[endpoint setup in the ILMessageFilterExtensionNetworkURL value of the Info.plist file] that the deferQueryRequestToNetwork will request on every message
Since all requests to these 2 endpoints are made by iOS itself (deferQueryRequestToNetwork), I don't understand how I can protect these endpoints on my side, like API key, or maybe mTLS.
The only way that I found is white list for Apple IP range.
Is there other methods for it?
Hi Apple Developers,
I am currently working on a message filtering application and facing issues specifically with filtering RCS (Rich Communication Services) messages. To debug this, I created a sample app that consistently categorizes all incoming messages as "junk." However, the filtering behaviour is inconsistent and not functioning as expected.
Here are the key issues observed during testing on iOS versions 18.2.1 and 18.3:
Inconsistent Filtering Behavior:
When a message is received from an unknown number, it sometimes gets moved to the Junk folder momentarily but is then immediately moved back to the main Messages inbox.
In some cases, the message does not get moved to the Junk folder at all, despite the app returning the verdict as "junk."
Duplicate Contact Tiles:
The Messages app displays two separate conversation tiles for the same mobile number, which is unexpected behavior.
For reference, my carrier partner is T-Mobile. Please let me know if you need any additional information to investigate this issue further.
Looking forward to your insights and guidance.
Best regards,
Rijul Singhal
Hey!
I am developing a macOS application with the help of an external vendor, who is supplying me with a closed-source XCFramework.
In Xcode, when I import their XCFramework bundle, when running the app, or opening a SwiftUI preview, or interacting with the app in any form, I get the familiar dialog:
"[SDK name].framework" Not Opened - Apple could not verify "[SDK name].framework" is free from malware that may harm your Mac or compromise privacy.
(Regardless, the application can run on my machine.)
But indeed, their cross-platform iOS/macOS XCFramework is not notarized at all (using spctl -a -t install), plus the macOS binary embedded is not code signed correctly (using codesign -d). The XCFramework itself is production code signed with a Developer ID certificate, however I believed the above issues to be valid.
Now, I asked the vendor to provide a correctly distributed (so code signed and notarized) framework, however they pointed out that "when I embed and sign the product in my app, it will be re-signed anyways". I understand this is true, but I believe this to be an important security boundary. If I were to re-sign under my name a closed source binary - previously unchecked for malware by Apple Notary Service -, I would put myself up for embedding potentially malicious code in my app, which could only be traced back to me - which would in turn mean a security issue would hinder my reputation here.
Am I being over-protective here, or is this a valid concern? I have no way to see the source code, so I strongly believe this XCFramework should be notarized correctly. I understand that an in-house XCFramework is fine unnotarized, given that I know its origin, but this seems like a unique case where notarization should be enforced from my side on the vendor.
In iOS 26, on iPad (as least, but maybe phone too, yet to test) if you tap an iMessage (a second time) that should launch an iMessage App, it does not launch app.
Has anyone else seen this - it makes many iMessage app unusable.
Steps to reproduce
Send a message that launches iMessage on tap.
Tap message on recipient's device.
Observe iMessage App open.
Dismiss iMessage
Tap message again
Observe nothing happens, app is not launched.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
General
Based on the documentation, I understand that the UnwantedCommunicationReporting extension works with SMS and MMS messages. However, I'd like official confirmation about support for different message types:
SMS: Appears to be supported ✅
MMS: Appears to be supported ✅
RCS (Rich Communication Services): Support unclear ❓
iMessage: Support unclear ❓